Posted on 10/17/2015 2:48:31 PM PDT by xzins
Show me the Ebola cases that have happened in the thousands of years of Homo Sapiens existence.
It’s always seemed to me that male homosexuality is more hard-wired, by which I mean nothing more than it seems to have an early onset. Female homosexuality, on the other hand, often seems to be a reaction to negative heterosexual experiences later in life, more of a conscious choice.
You are being serious? Really?
Where do you suppose AIDS developed and spread from?
Oh sorry, I misread your post. WTF does Ebola have to do with homosexuality?
I agree. Nor does it make it healthy. The deadliness of homosexual sex, far beyond that of natural sex, says that something is wrong with the equation.
And, of course, heterosexuals must make decisions all the time about fidelity to their partners. They are wired to be attracted to the opposite sex and opportunities to say NO abound.
So, sex can be turned down. No can be the answer. And people saying No can live with it.
Choice
Ebola has nothing to do with sexuality. But it’s a virus that is spread between humans. AIDS is more readily spread through anal sex than it is other forms. As a whole, homosexual men have more anal sex than heterosexuals. Heterosexuals can spread AIDS through anal sex at the same rate that homosexuals can.
Here’s the thing. Homosexual male sex is the way it is because of the male sex drive. Think back to a heterosexual male’s teenage years. He would have sex with anything that would have him. The twenties are not much difference. The female sex drive has a caution to it that the male sex drive does not have.
Males who are attracted to males are not held back by the more cautious female sex drive. There are aberrations within the female community, but they are few and far between. Of course male on male sex unbridled is going to be more dangerous, just like it is for heterosexuals in cases where everything goes and you can screw anyone you want in a large population. That is just asking for sexual disease infection.
I agree. Environment can open up different doors for different folks, but people say no all the time to all manner of things.
Even if there is not gay gene, a lot of gay people really don’t “choose” to be that way (imho) anymore than people “choose” their personalities. It’s really not that simple (imho). Conservatives should not push this idea because it’s being disingenuous.
Thats the ‘theory’.
What we do know is that after it started it spread EXCLUSIVELY via the homosexual population. If you recall it was first known as ‘Gay Cancer”. Then the druggies, many who were either gay themselves or shared needles with those that were, spread it further.
And not because hetros got or spread it. Patient Zero was believed to be a gay male flight attendant.
Lest we forget, Democrats for years hammered Reagan over funding because it was ‘a gay mans disease’.
To say that this had ANYthing to do with straights is laughable. But also dangerous propaganda straight from ACT-Up.
“Even if there were a gene it wouldn’t make it normal. It would then be a birth defect.”
True it would not be normal, but it would be out of their control. That is the lie we have to refute.
They can get help for their mental illness and they can recover. They just don’t want to.
Actually, it is even worse than that. Some of them may want to, but the pressure to stay in the gay cult is strong and part of that coercion includes warnings of suicide if they even try to leave. Some of them who do manage to escape the lifestyle and their same sex attraction say that they were afraid that they might die if they went through reparative therapy, but they had nothing to lose because they were so miserable that they wanted to die anyway.
The activists in the gay cult are pure evil.
“Heterosexuals can spread AIDS through anal sex at the same rate that homosexuals can.”
Sure. Now tell me the ways a hetero can get infected without ‘Homosexuality” appearing somewhere in the history of that infection.
If heterosexuals had sex with the abandon that the gay male community has had sex, there would be every bit as much disease in the heterosexual communities.
Homosexuals are not blameless for the disease that has run through their lives. Harm reduction, monogamy, safe sex and discretion should be the rule whatever your sexuality is.
Abstinence is the true way to stay away from sexual diseases. After that, it’s all a risk.
Absolutely agree.
“If heterosexuals had sex with the abandon that the gay male community has had sex, there would be every bit as much disease in the heterosexual communities.”
And you are not seeing the obvious here?
I think there is both a genetic component and a social component to homosexuality. I think that the social component is the biggest contributor. I think f you look at the background of most adult homosexuals you will find sexual abuse but even in that number there are some kids that are just born that way but I think that is a very low percentage
Anyone who gets AIDS has shared blood or other bodily fluids at some rate with the people before them.
A heterosexual person can have sex with another person of opposite sex and not realize that that person may be infected, same way that no one can trace back syphilis or gonorrhea or a case of the crabs.
It’s out there. Various people may be infected. It’s as simple as that.
Because in their hearts, the left knows: The first thing a lefty couple not fully engaged with the destruction of our nation will ask is "Is it gay" and get an abortion if they are.
I totally understand what you are saying.
Being an indifferent slut of any community is only asking for trouble.
Having a monogamous relationship with one other person, regardless of sex, is not going to spring up diseases out of nowhere.
I have a disagreement with that. Auto-immunity and/or andro-immunity could result from male sex material being attacked by bodily defenses and defenses formed against it.
Additionally, the very act of anal sex places the sex organ in an unhealthy environment. Moreover, since the anus is not made by nature for this act, the health problems of anal cancer, incontinence, tearing, etc., are all problems in the homosexual community that simply aren’t problems in the heterosexual community.
Also, your example of promiscuity itself suggests that homosexual sex is not fulfilling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.