Why Can't Two Gay Brothers Marry?

townhall.com ^ | Oct 23, 2015 | Michael Brown

[dbehsman]

It's only a matter of time. We all saw this coming.

[Pollster1]

. . . gay cousins should be allowed to “marry.” And that only begs the next obvious question: Why not gay brothers or gay sisters?

By liberal "logic", gay brothers should be able to marry, even if one is male and one is female, so long as they both feel male (or both female) at the time of the wedding.

[Tax-chick]

Why can’t (number)(adjective)(noun) marry?

[Pollster1]

Exactly. Liberals despise marriage because they are so bad at it, so their solution is to make the word meaningless.

[Tax-chick]

Once the one man/one woman lifetime commitment is abandoned, there is no logical point at which to say, “This, but not that.”

[gusty]

Read an interesting article on the subject of gay marriage. The author argued that the Supreme Court went so overboard in the justification of their decision that they rendered no fault divorce unconstitutional. The legal reasoning on gay marriage by the SC when applied to no fault divorce can only conclude that the non-consenting party’s rights are violated in no fault cases.

[Tax-chick]

If you can find it, would you provide a link to the article?

[Nervous Tick]

>> The horse is out of the barn and anything goes.

This is what is meant by the “slippery slope”. You can’t take “just one step” out onto it without sliding all the way into the pit.

May GOD have mercy on us.

[tbpiper]

...arguments against consensual adult incest is that incestuous unions could result in children with genetic defects...

I read some time back that some 'expert' said that this should no longer a prohibition since abortions are so readily available.

[GreyFriar]

I wonder if anyone brought this up at the Synod? (hopefully it wasn’t)

[MortMan]

What many seem to miss is that gubmint will rescind the marriage waiver for inheritance before they let go of the decedent’s money.

[varon]

I guess there are just too many who have forgotten the words of God...one man, one woman.

That went by the wayside right after "One man, one vote"...........

[gusty]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDsQqQIwBWoVChMIjbzf2NvbyAIVgTs-Ch0jqwC7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnypost.com%2F2015%2F10%2F22%2Fhow-the-victory-of-gay-marriage-could-save-all-marriage%2F&usg=AFQjCNHOjHllAoBQkqfCMlZNgDHYBCAf2g&sig2=9bYJVLeAFjamdZ3VWkATOA

[cloudmountain]

That went by the wayside right after "One man, one vote"...........

It also had to be a man with property, that is, moneyed.

[grey_whiskers]

Read an interesting article on the subject of gay marriage. The author argued that the Supreme Court went so overboard in the justification of their decision that they rendered no fault divorce unconstitutional. The legal reasoning on gay marriage by the SC when applied to no fault divorce can only conclude that the non-consenting party’s rights are violated in no fault cases.

Can you post a link, please?