Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

While on active duty stationed in one state I purchased a rifle and took it with me to a follow-on assignment in another state. You’re claiming that’s a federal crime?


20 posted on 11/13/2015 5:39:52 AM PST by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: GreyHoundSailor

It used to be a federal crime (1968 GCL)to buy any gun in one state if you live in another. Now you can buy a rifle or shotgun in one state if you live in another provided the state you live in allows such firearms.

It is still illegal to buy Handguns in one state if you live in a different state.


24 posted on 11/13/2015 6:09:30 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: GreyHoundSailor

What the poster is trying to say is that it is illegal to buy a gun in one state, when you live in another without the services of an FFL. Your case seems to be you lived in the same state you bought the gun in, then you moved to another state, taking your gun with you. That is legal.


26 posted on 11/13/2015 6:44:41 AM PST by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: GreyHoundSailor

When you were on active duty stationed in a certain state, weren’t you living in that state for some period of time? Wouldn’t that make you a resident of that state for the purpose of the laws, and then when you moved elsewhere there should have been no issue.

But then IANAL (but I did once have concurrent residence in two different states and was able to buy firearms in both states).


27 posted on 11/13/2015 6:45:15 AM PST by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: GreyHoundSailor
While on active duty stationed in one state I purchased a rifle and took it with me to a follow-on assignment in another state. You’re claiming that’s a federal crime?

Assuming that the rifle purchased was not capable of fully automatic fire and had a barrel length meeting the minimum requirement, as long as the rifle remained in your possession you are OK. Giving it away (to a relative) or swapping it (at a gun show) is not clearly defined. If you were to sell your rifle in your new state of residency it could be considered a 'straw man purchase' unless you happened to be a licensed firearms dealer.

Regards,
GtG

30 posted on 11/13/2015 7:52:40 AM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, but it's OK. They all know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: GreyHoundSailor
"While on active duty stationed in one state I purchased a rifle and took it with me to a follow-on assignment in another state. You’re claiming that’s a federal crime?"

No. But if you had been stationed in (for example) Virginia, and drove to (for example) Kentucky, bought a gun, and then drove back to Virginia, it would have been.

As I understand it, the way it works is that you MUST go to a licensed firearms dealer in Kentucky, have him ship the gun to a licensed dealer in Virginia, and you pick it up there. Don't know which of the FFL's has to do the background check, but one must happen.

Now, I think the above is totally stupid, but legislators pass a lot of totally stupid laws.

35 posted on 11/13/2015 11:06:33 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson