Posted on 11/14/2015 12:30:53 PM PST by FourPeas
Agreed. And hope that he hasn’t already depressed the dead-man’s switch.
Thank you for your vigilance.
TSA = welfare by another name
There were reports of a mutilated body outside the stadium. Maybe that was him.
Or the third SU bomber who detonated his vest by the nearby McDonalds
Best comment. He would have been invited to the White House to show off his invention.
The guard let the guy go instead of arresting him on the spot. Did he at least call the police?
Well, the guy blew himself up....not sure there was much the guard could have done.
You were NOT WRONG, not alone AND i’ll approach any one of these ME’s when they act suspicious. No fear, no quarter.
The TSA would have escorted him to his seat for $10
...and stolen his iphone.
__________________________
LMAO!
If you play fair and provide freedom and rights to non-citizens and anyone who would do us harm you lose and they win.
I found this out in a better reported story on the event.
Premature detonation can happen to even the best of suicide bombers.
One account I read described the Muslim scum as running from the guard and then detonating.
I will be the first to admit I don’t like lumping muslims or anyone else together in this fashion. But the muslim world is one of these three (read all, not just the first one):
1.) Unable to have any influence or exert pressure to rid Islam of this element
2.) Unwilling to rid Islam of this element
3.) Actively or passively approving this element
Bernard Lewis explains very well in his various works how this element is outlined in the Koran (which I have not read except in passages) and how it has been interpreted in the past and is being in interpreted today and it is not wise to rule out option #3 in a good part of the muslim world.
The problem is, it is impossible to discern if a faithful follower of the Koran is speaking/acting genuinely, or if they are engaged in taqiya (which for those who might not know the term, describes deliberate, religiously acceptable, if not mandated, deception and deceit to further the cause of Islam.)
This is very difficult for me, and I have to deal with it in some rational way because I cannot imagine muslims I may know or have known in my life might practice it, so I have to leave room to assess things on an individual basis.
But I do not believe at all that it is wise to give muslims any kind of unfettered access to this country, be it through work, education, tourism or as a part of an outright immigration/refugee process. If I take this stand, it is not personal if directed at some woman and child trying to come in as part of a large group of refugees.
I wish my country to deny them access, and that is it. I am not calling that woman or child a terrorist, and I recognize that they may indeed be good and virtuous, but we cannot separate the good from the bad, and we need to protect ourselves.
Protect ourselves from violence.
Never mind protect ourselves from a cultural invasion as parts of Europe are finding out they should be doing. It is going on here too, just not on as great a scale as is occurring in some Scandinavian countries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.