Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Executive Order Gives Criminals The Upper Hand
Absolute Rights ^ | 11/24/15 | Mike Lavery

Posted on 11/24/2015 2:41:46 PM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: markomalley
But it does appear to be a domestic dispute (the following as accessed today).

OpenSecrets.org
American Fedn of St/Cnty/Munic Employees [State/County/Municipal Employees]
[Total Contributions:] $94,708,977
[To Dems & liberals:] $93,739,954
[To Repubs & Conservs:] $671,755
[Pct to Dems & liberals:] 99%
[Pct to Repubs & Conservs:] 1%



21 posted on 11/24/2015 3:53:11 PM PST by familyop ("Dry land is not just our destination, it is our destiny!" --"Deacon," "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

I agree that this is a good thing; there is no reason for us to live in communities like defeated people with an occupying enemy force around us. This nonsense has gotten like something out of the defeated districts in “The Hunger Games”.

Local cops should only have the same tools available as those they “police” (meaning the taxpayers who pay them and buy their equipment).


22 posted on 11/24/2015 3:54:02 PM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
‘we don’t know what you could have done to save us without that armored vehicle.‘”

I have an idea, buy your own weapons and shoot back next time. It's not our fault you aren't prepared. My 80 year old hill raised grandmother wouldn't hesitate for a second to shoot back, and that's no exaggeration either. What's wrong with you?

23 posted on 11/24/2015 3:57:27 PM PST by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Lurker; Amendment10

Well, since most criminal gangs have armored vehicle mounted Quad 50s, the police are REALLY going to be in a world of hurt now...


24 posted on 11/24/2015 4:38:32 PM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I think you will see that His Arrogance is only taking the equipment back from red state police or unreliable (non-progressive) sheriffs in Blue states. All the ghetto police forces such as NYC, LA, Baltimore, etc. will keep the equipment.


25 posted on 11/24/2015 4:53:06 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (If you are reading this then you are one of the 6.5 billion people the NWO wants to kill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

“the local police departments claiming that they are attempting to recover stolen local / state tax revenues.”

Except they’re not doing that. They just want Uncle Sugar to keep giving them “free” shit. If this Sheriff wants an APC let him convince his local taxpayers to fund it.

L


26 posted on 11/24/2015 5:21:47 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Our Dear Leader is taking back the weapons from sheriffs to get ready for Martial Law. Too many sheriffs have said “stick it” when it comes to confiscation of firearms.


27 posted on 11/24/2015 5:24:24 PM PST by oldasrocks (They should lock all of you up and only let out us properly medicated people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

When I saw a thread on this earlier, I thought it’s a good thing to end the militarization of the police. But on rethinking it, this might be a pre-emptive move on the Admin’s part in response to the positive reaction the GOP candidates are getting from their anti-illegals and anti-refugee positions that defend the rights of actual citizens. Could be that the Admin sees this as another way to disarm the People in the event a majority is able to organize against whatever oppressive gubmit impositions he has planned before his term is up.


28 posted on 11/24/2015 5:54:24 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("Look, the establishment doesn't want me, because I don't need the establishment." --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Police departments don’t need military equipment. They don’t need APCs. They don’t need full auto weapons for that matter. I’d strip it all away and send it back to the national guard, or let civilians buy it.


29 posted on 11/24/2015 7:34:05 PM PST by zeugma (Generation Snowflake. Kinda says it all doesn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker; All
"If this Sheriff wants an APC let him convince his local taxpayers to fund it."

With all due respect Lurker, you are missing the point.

How can the local taxpayers afford to fund an APC for sheriff out of their own pockets when the feds keep on stealing money from the locals wallets through unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that corrupt Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers?

And I would not be surprised if the sheriff does not know any better then the locals do that all the taxpayers in their community are being robbed by the feds every time they send in their federal taxes.

30 posted on 11/24/2015 8:46:22 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
“Items on the prohibited list include armored tracked vehicles, weaponized aircraft and vehicles, .50-caliber firearms and ammo, bayonets, and camouflage.” Sheriff Bo Machismo: “But you don’t *understand*, we neeeed that stuff! For like a zombie apocalypse, or a Canadian moose mounted shock troop invasion force!” Seriously, years ago, one big city Sheriff complained that he needed a water cooled .30 caliber machine gun, “so if a terrorist hijacked a plane we could shoot it down.”

While what you say holds water, look at he flip side - he is also taking away equipment that could be useful if governors/sheriffs decided the feds had overstepped their bounds...

This is an issue that causes me to feel torn - hate for local cops to be so militarized, but Obama's EO on this also makes me uncomfortable about what the government is up to.

31 posted on 11/25/2015 3:02:07 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 5th MEB
even Obastards shock troops have to get OUT of their AFV in order to enforce the rat bastards illegal “EXECUTIVE ORDERS”.

There is allegedly a Chinese saying that you can conquer a country on horseback, but you can't rule it from horseback. The same applies to tanks and APCs. Eventually the tax collectors have to mingle among the people. Then they're vulnerable.

32 posted on 11/25/2015 12:51:56 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Never mind they got it for free, didn't need it before and don't need it now.
The equipment was intended to be used against Right-Wingers, TEA Partiers, American Patriots and other uppity regular folks who oppose Washington.
0bama didn't like it when it was used against his own homeboys.

33 posted on 11/25/2015 7:32:56 PM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson