Posted on 11/28/2015 11:33:21 AM PST by JoeSeales
thank your for doing that
it’s such a great way to see what it looked like
The MSM will not show those pictures of the crowds. It doesn’t fit their narrative.
Thanks for posting!
Go to google and type in Dozens line up for Donald Trump rally in Sarasota.
When you click on that story and the page o p ens up, the headline magically changes to Supporters pack arena for Donald Trump rally.
It looks like they tried to lie about how many supporters were there, got busted and had to change the headline.
They lied again.
All they do is lie.
Yet so many people still put their trust in MSM and believe anything they are told.
I have to deprogram my mom regularly.
She still doesn’t get it.
Great pictures!
Go Trump, Go!
I will say that she filed the first report at 6:57 though.
Oh okay.
That actually makes sense.
Thanks.
‘Acceptance’ from Trump’s distractors will eventually set in including from the media and pollsters who willingly keep Trump’s numbers lower. Not too long now until it starts to begin at the Iowa Caucus. ;-)
You’re welcome RMD. :-)
A Cruz rally with about 100 to 125 there. ;-)
What you said was right, and as far as I can tell, they never explained how many were outside. They said thousands. There may have been upwards of 8,000 out there.
I know. I’m so looking forward to this.
TTTT
Trump too said today that he wants the elections right now.
Hehe. Yeah it’s only a matter of time.
When they say his numbers are dropping, there’s one thing that might be a factor and that’s the millions of people who are pissed off at govt, media, pollsters,etc.
If they try and poll someone like that, I would imagine the odds of hearing nothing but a quiet click in response are very high.
We never do polls and surveys at our house.
“No thank you. Not interested.” Click.
I think even the RNC gave up on our house.
Just like the way the media tried to hide the number of people at the Sept, 2009 rally in DC. I told some Libtards that I work with about how large the rally was and after reviewing my pictures, they were ticked off at the media then for not reporting it. And they are not on our side.
And you who supported him will quickly have buyer's remorse. It's kinda obvious right now that you would, to me. Hopefully you'll muster the courage to face some truths about Trump in time, and vote smart instead of "to win."
I expect we will overwhelmingly get much good out of Trump with maybe an occasional annoyance. If Reagan had to contend with the Internet, he would have gotten heck over his amnesty, and giving into Libs to freeze in place select fire guns , degrading the 2nd Amendment, that could be bought by the public.
Or Reagan’s nominations of Sandra O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy likely would have been vetted much better by the public who would have given Reagan heck again and again.
Come on Red, do not under-estimate senator Rafael Eduardo Cruz! I counted 185 in that room.
Losing is not an option this time. Losing is just that, losing.
Equating that with being “smart” is laughable. Smart is winning and getting at least 75% of what you want. Beats 0% that you will get from losing.
Ok, but I’ll only say 150 max. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.