I agree completely.
Even George Noory just agreed with his guest, who said this “climate change” nonsense is a misdirection.
What the world should be paying attention to is pollution. Not “climate change”.
The premature ballyhooing of the CFL bulb, which there shouldn’t be any problem with enlightened people choosing, but is a big problem forcing on people who just don’t want it, is now a big part of a pollution picture that probably won’t come completely into focus for many years, by which time we’ll find ourselves with a spike in the presence of mercury in our lives and no other way to explain it.
Pollution, and lots of different issues will require thoughtful responses over time.
One issue that has very significant and detrimental consequences, and relates to global warming, is the decline in scientific integrity, and the politicization of science. We are publishing more research papers now than ever before in history, but whether or not the findings are correct, and can be replicated, has become a toss-up. IMHO, this is not a minor issue, and clearly the politicization of climate science, and the suppression of opposing data, has had huge global geopolitical and economic consequences. The same things happen in biomedical science, physical sciences, and seemingly across the spectrum.