[Twinkie]

These Gun-Grabbers sure don’t mind lying through their
teeth do they, as long as they can grab your guns?
WHO in their right mind objects to anyone on the “terror
watch list” having their guns grabbed or being prevented
from buying more?

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

I mind.

Because countless people with common names like Jack Smith, Alexandra Hayes, David Nelson, etc. are on these so-called watch lists, and so are the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people who share these common names. They still fly, but have to go through endless intrusive and time-consuming hassles at the airport, and sometimes miss connecting flights.

The government can add names and there is no re-course to getting your name removed from these lists.

We should object, lest every member of the NRA and every TEA Party man or woman ends up on these so-called terror lists.

[hanamizu]

right mind objects to anyone on the “terror
watch list” having their guns grabbed or being prevented
from buying more?

---

On my good days, I’m often in my right mind. I object to the idea that a fundamental right can be denied because somebody has put my name on a list. There is no due process, no appeal process—in fact the person on the list is not told he is on the list. You get on the list because someone (and you don’t get to know who) thinks you should be on it. Does that really sound like a good idea to you?

[Axenolith]

I object to anyone on the terror “watch list” being arbitrarily denied their rights because it’s run by idiots and there is no due process involved. I’d sooner see just being a follower of islam as the defining rights denial benchmark because the manual instructs the devout to kill and subjugate and is incompatible with the Constitution and Republic.