Just saying...
More anti-Trump blather???? Trump meant business in his speech last night. Someone needs to take the reins of this country or we’re all going to get killed by these savages.
Nevermind that sh!t... here come the Trumpty Dumpties to say Trump never proposed such a thing and put his words back together again.
Ask them if they believe that the koran is infallible and if they abide by it. If so, no entry.
>> the wrong response to Political Correctness ...
The first response is often awkward...
In fact, now that he’s “clarified” that he’s not just talking about immigration but a moratorium on all Muslim entry to the United States, he’s gone well beyond being the anti-Obama and has reacted straight into foolishness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We now have over 4ooo people dead, killed on American soil due to Muslim attacks in America. We do not have the ability to sort the good Muslims from the bad.We need to aquire that ability.
Trump ‘s call for a moratorium on Muslim immigration is not foolish. It is entirely sensible.
Time to get real rather than just squeal.
Everybody needs to read this article. It catalogs what has happened in various countries almost in lockstep with the rise in the percentage of the Muslim population. Terrorism, political changes, etc. This would give Trump a lot of ammunition if he referenced the facts inside of it.
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30675
Trumps Muzzie moratorium is REAL “Hope and Change”. Something that should have happened 14 years ago. And BTW once again the MSM is twisting Trumps statement. Trump NEVER said US citizens who are Muslim would be barred from reentering the country if they left. No joke, I’ve seen about 10 articles so far stating this. It’s unbelievable to me the way the media lies about this guy.
are you equating the Tea Party with the Islamic terrorists otherwise your statement makes no sense? The Tea Party doesn’t cut off heads and hasn’t declared war on the civilized world
Every single Muslim is a threat if he believes in the Koran.
I guess they need a punch in the mouth.
They wouldn’t do it on a dare and that’s what I think Trump is up to. Testing to see how far they can be pushed because it’ll show how much of what they claim to stand for is bullshit.
He is absolutely right except for the moment we need a moratorium all immigration. Then let’s see where we are and revisit out total immigration policy. Like pre-1965 for example.
This thread is my tipping point I think. A minority... I will say 25% of Freepers are backing a reality TV star real eastate swindler who is not conservative, and could give a rat’s ass about the U.S. constitution unless it can be warped by the Supreme Court to suit his own financial agenda.
A throwdown is due... soon.
Britain no longer a Christian country, and it’s time to rid public life of Anglicanism, panel says.
A two-year commission, chaired by the former senior judge Baroness Butler-Sloss and involving leading religious leaders of all faiths, calls for public life to be systematically de-Christianized.
It says the decline of church-going and the rise of Islam and other beliefs mean a “new settlement†is needed for religion in the U.K., giving more official influence to non-religious voices and those of non-Christian faiths.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3369636/posts
But even the PC National Review won’t write the truth, that the problem with radical Moslems is Islam itself and that the violence and deadly intent are all through the Koran and there are nor radical Moslems insofar a Moslems who believe more profoundly in what their Prophet ordained. A Moslem believes or is apostate. The apostate is subject to being killed for his apostasy.Some are less eager to wage the violent jihad that the Koran requires all to participate in but none will oppose it except where politically advantageous for influencing the infidel to let down his guard.
This statement is a short-sighted interpretation of what Trump said.
There is nothing wrong with closing our borders to select groups when confronted with actionable intelligence or to place some groups under greater scrutiny because of known threats.
It would be easier to counter an extreme like Islamic immigration with an extreme like a total ban, and then open up for exceptions who don’t pose a security risk. Imagine if during WW2 we had an open door policy allowing Nazis to immigrate here, (something that in reality would have been less harmful than our present situation). We may claim we are not at war with Islam, but Islam is always at jihad with non believers, even if that means they are waiting until their numbers are sufficient to act. A zero tolerance of Islam is a good starting point for making exceptions.
Ok, so stop ALL immigration and visas.
It's not a response of unthinking ideology. It's a thoughtful response to an existential threat.
Why is following the refugee law wrong? It requires us to ask about religion. Trump didn’t write the law.