Dangerous game? LMAO
You folks have non-stop talked about the fact you can’t support a flip-flopper for over six months now.
And yet, that’s what you’re backing.
How does it fell to back a guy that is comfortable with McCain/Kennedy and the Gang of 8 plan just two years ago?
As I said, there was no plan for a pathway in there, but La Raza, MEChLa, the ACLU will be on that like white on rice.
There’s no way the SCOTUS will allow those green card holders to be treated differently.
After thousands of votes Cruz is arguably the most conservative member of the Senate. Trumpees are upset with a few of them, as am I. Trump has been pro-abortion, for gun control, supported Tarp, bailouts, Obama’s stimulus plans, wanted nationalized healthcare, wanted to bring in Syrian refugees, was a Democrat, an independent, said Hillary was a “terrific” Secretary of State, and the list goes on and on.
Now, he is an evangelical.
The fact that anyone believes a single thing he says or trusts his judgement is puzzling enough, the fact that Trumpees try to deflect one or two votes against the most conservative Presidental candidate in decades is downright baffling.
Okay, I will stipulate, without knowing the facts, that Cruz had a bad vote on a bill two years ago. Care to address the myriad positions of Trump? He has held them all.
Furthermore, The Iowa Republican published this article about a week ago.
http://theiowarepublican.com/2015/yes-cruz-is-a-hypocrite-when-it-comes-to-the-rfs-and-big-oil/
The article sure looks to be illuminating. I find this to be an important distinction in the Iowa paper article:
"Cruz has often referred to the RFS as a "subsidy," but it is not. While it is a mandate on the oil industry to blend a certain amount of fuel with renewable alternatives like ethanol, it doesn't cost federal taxpayers or the federal government a dime."
Cruz looks to be vulnerable in Iowa to the hypocrisy charge.