Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury deadlocked in Baltimore police officer's trial
MSN News ^ | 12/15/2015

Posted on 12/15/2015 1:00:51 PM PST by detective

Edited on 12/15/2015 1:09:27 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: silverleaf

Were they out of Charmin?


41 posted on 12/15/2015 1:38:34 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Yes, it was simply a political payout to make it go away

No way a loser like Freddie’s Dead had an earnings potential anywhere near that settlement. Not even by including his career as a dealer.

Racial Shakedown at its best


42 posted on 12/15/2015 1:39:06 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (Muslim silence = complicity. Muslim immigration: END it, can't mend it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

They looted sh!t house paper....ROFL!!!


43 posted on 12/15/2015 1:39:13 PM PST by Dog (..."I'm just a cook..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: detective

Not guilty:

“A black man was killed and we demand JUSTICE!”

Guilty:

“A black man was unjustly convicted and we demand JUSTICE!”

Either way, someone’s going to get some sweet kicks for Christmas.


44 posted on 12/15/2015 1:40:45 PM PST by Right2BareArms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The Farce continues.....

Baltimore, and Maryland people pay/paid for this show.


45 posted on 12/15/2015 1:41:42 PM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Maybe some on the jury are afraid to acquit. A hung jury gives them the cover of voting “present”.


46 posted on 12/15/2015 1:41:43 PM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

You think they are going to riot?


47 posted on 12/15/2015 1:43:27 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Good for you.

I did that once as well, in my 20s, as a juror.

Brought the jury back into the courtroom twice because they told me I didn’t hear something correctly.

Turns out I was right both times.

Meant the difference between someone going to prison or not.

It stood at 11-1 for two days, and it was as if I was on trial, if you catch my drift.

Four counts—two guilty, two not guilty, or I said I would hang the jury. They saw it my way, and justice was served.

it surprised me how little people listen, and worse than that, how much they inferred because a state policeman was giving testimony.

I showed them how they put words in the trooper’s mouth that he did not say, in order to get the conviction the state wanted.

This was 30 years ago, when you could still get a decent education at school.

I hate to think what kind of critical thinkers we have today.

That’s why Jesse Watters’ segments are not funny to me.


48 posted on 12/15/2015 1:44:38 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: exit82

It has to be done.

God forbid it, but if I’m ever on trial I want sane, intelligent thinking people in the jury box. I owe my country, and my fellow citizens, no less.


49 posted on 12/15/2015 1:49:15 PM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Amen to what you said.

Wish more folks understood that.


50 posted on 12/15/2015 1:51:27 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: detective
In related news...

In a quiet Baltimore courtroom, three stories above the court where officer William Porter was facing a jury for his alleged role in the death of Freddie Gray, another young African American man was on trial this week for entirely different offenses related to Gray*s death.

Gregory Butler was facing charges for allegedly carrying a knife, trying to steal a cigarettes from a looted 7-Eleven store and escaping from police custody during the riot that followed Freddie Gray*s funeral. He also now faces federal charges over allegedly poking holes in a hose that was being used to put out a fire at CVS.

[snip]

The US attorney*s office charged Butler with aiding and abetting arson, which brings a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years, and with committing or attempting to “obstruct, impede, and interfere with firemen lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of their official duties”, which has a mandatory minimum sentence of five years. Since there is no parole for these charges, if convicted, Greg Butler, will likely spend far more time in prison than any of the officers charged in the death of Freddie Gray. And while the officers were immediately released on bail, Butler was held in jail for over a month with no bail.


51 posted on 12/15/2015 1:59:25 PM PST by Daffynition (*Gun control is a tool to make innocents pay the price for the guilty* W.LaPierre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I think Freddie damaged himself in hopes of a lawsuit and payout but was too thorough and died. Can you imagine being the cop who was driving the van? One minute he is driving around and the next he is in jail on a accessory rap or some damn thing.


52 posted on 12/15/2015 2:00:42 PM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatima

Not yet. They didn’t deliver an acquittal, so a retrial might be possible. It is always best to time these verdicts for the coldest part of the year if possible.


53 posted on 12/15/2015 2:18:30 PM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: detective

Popcorn.


54 posted on 12/15/2015 2:22:17 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Here comes the Christmas looting.


55 posted on 12/15/2015 2:29:37 PM PST by Old Yeller (Obama is winning the war on terror when you realize he is on the side of the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I think it’s Christmas shopping time in Baltimore this evening.


56 posted on 12/15/2015 2:34:06 PM PST by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
They looted a local shoe store and not a single pair of work boots was taken.

And no taxpayer was harmed during filming.

57 posted on 12/15/2015 2:48:07 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: detective

Ruh row. Baltimore burning?


58 posted on 12/15/2015 2:50:30 PM PST by Martin Tell (Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Catoni.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainAmiigaf
A serious question. IF the police are found NOT GUILTY of the “crimes” of which they stand accused. why would the City of Baltimore be paying this huge settlement? Yes, a sympathetic and compensatory payment to the family.

Because a conviction in a criminal case requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while a civil judgment requires only proof by a preponderance. It is not uncommon in these kind of cases for the officer to get acquitted in the criminal case but the City to be found liable in a civil case.

59 posted on 12/15/2015 3:05:04 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: exit82
On the other side of the coin, I was on a jury trying a guy charged with aggravated assault. Each person on the jury had been asked if they had a problem with sending someone to prison, and each had answered "no".

During the deliberation process, two people didn't want to vote guilty because they didn't want to send the guy to jail. I--being convinced the guy WAS guilty--brought up the fact that a vote of not guilty should be based on reasonable doubt--NOT personal feelings--which they should have disclosed during jury selection.

Fortunately, the two DID vote guilty, and after the trial we found out the guy had been in prison before for similar crimes.

60 posted on 12/15/2015 3:41:17 PM PST by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson