I watched the entire series. He was framed. No doubt about it. He had no motive. Way too many questions to convict.
How is it possible that only after the eighth search of rhe trailer did the Malawi detective, who wasn’t supposed to be involved in the case to begin with, find the key fob with a nylon strap have only Avery’s DNA laying in plain site? That’s impossible.
How is it that the same detective found a bullet in plain site in about the easiest garage ever after several searches and allegedly only non-blood DNA from the victim. And how could anyone possibly shoot a victim several times in the garage and leave no blood or other DNA evidence? They even dug up the cracked concrete floor. There was no evidence she was ever even in the garage.
And if the victim was raped in his bedroom, how was it possible there was no evidence she was ever in the house?
As for her bones being in the fire pit, why was every procedure foe excavating burnt remains violated? I’ll tell you why. Her remains were burned somewhere else and moved there.
The family owned a salvage yard and if he did it, he would have crushed the car and disposed of it. The blood in the car was planted. Don you really think anyone could not possibly have seen the smear right by the ignition switch?
He had a girlfriend he truly loved and was about to start a trial which would have paid him multiple millions of dollars. Members of the Mattawoc sheriff’s department and the County would have been liable. Don’t know who murdered the woman, but there was no real evidence Avery did it.
You’re falling for the magic of lefty propaganda. Lets continue to discredit the legal system every day.
Our local talk radio host LAWYER was there during the entire trial and got to know the film makers. They had financial motive to make an exoneration film, it was clear that was the goal from the first day. He said the case was concrete, and the defense was unable to refute any of the evidence. All they did was say ‘the cops did it’.
No real evidence? The evidence was ironclad, DNA on the bullets from Avery’s gun.
Blood planted? Sure.
1. Prosecution never established motive for Avery/Dassey.
2. Prosecution never placed Teresa inside Avery's trailer. An autotrader magazine and a receipt are not enough.
3. Teresa's DNA was not found on Avery or Dassey despite a physical altercation, rape, etc.
4. Evidence not secured in Avery's home or property
5. No blood spatter. Anywhere.
6. Cell phone records repeatedly tampered with
7. Rav4 key "magically" appears.
8. No other suspect was considered.
9. In a phone call detective identified make/model/year of car before it was known and he could not explain why.
10. Neighbor was inconsistent in time of arrival
There is more to the story, but I strongly believe the victim was not attacked inside Avery's place (no DNA).
There is enough inconsistencies based on what I have seen to issue not-guilty. The jury started off with 7 not guilty. They changed quickly. I think they may have filled in gaps in the prosecution's story.