Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2016 1:57:22 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

bkmk


2 posted on 01/03/2016 1:58:55 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Probably some sort of political payback.

We need to open up an Arlington II somewhere with lots of land and a historical connection to the founding of the country.


3 posted on 01/03/2016 2:01:07 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
One of the lesser Clinton scandals was when they arranged to have one of their big donors buried at Arlington based on a phony WWII service record (merchant marines)--the man was removed and buried elsewhere when the facts came out. It's possible that the Clintons were unaware that the man's service record was bogus--but it was in line with their modus operandi for donors.
4 posted on 01/03/2016 2:04:36 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

>>Arlington is an actual problem in search of a solution and I believe one can and must be found.

How about National Cemeteries placed so that you are never more than 100 miles away from one? I’ve made it known that I want to be buried in the one here in north Florida.

Sorry ladies, but being a WASP pilot should not qualify you for Arlington.


5 posted on 01/03/2016 2:05:03 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yeah, but Clinton and Obama will plant their political hacks there.


6 posted on 01/03/2016 2:08:06 PM PST by Redleg Duke (The Federal Government is nothing but a welfare program with a dress code!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They deserve respect for their service to their country but if merchant marine are not qualified, then they should not be either.

Merchant marine had to be an extremely dangerous job in the early years of the war.


7 posted on 01/03/2016 2:10:22 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I recall reading about the rules for being buried at Arlington, vs being cremated and interred. I was kind of surprised at how restrictive it was. But when you read about the number of combat vets that will be passing in the next twenty years that land is going to be sucked up pretty quickly.

I don’t have an answer, but this is going to be a bigger issue over the next few years.


8 posted on 01/03/2016 2:13:52 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Please tell Terry about this Cemetery https://dvs.az.gov/southern-memorial-cemetery.


11 posted on 01/03/2016 2:21:00 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"...If we can't solve this one then the nation may be culturally past the point of no return..."

This is hyperbole. The decision to allow or exclude WASPS from burial in Arlington isn't the thing that will push us over the edge of no return.

That said, they are non-military, so should not be buried at military cemeteries, in my opinion. WASPS were not ferrying aircraft into combat zones, but within the United States and rarely, Canada.

If we allow WASPS to be buried there, why not allow members of the Civilian Air Patrol to be buried in Arlington? I have heard that if you were in the Merchant Marine, you could be buried in military cemeteries, but haven't been able to confirm it. And they certainly had their lives on the line more than the WASPS did. Although forty or so were killed in WWII during training, that has to pale in comparison to the numbers of men killed in training alone. (I have heard 15,000 were killed in the USA in training aircraft alone from 1939 to 1945...don't know if that is accurate)

No disrespect to WASPS, but I simply don't think they should be buried in military cemeteries. I think we should acknowledge that they worked hard, did service that was necessary and could be dangerous, but I think it should be kept in context. I would suggest that even though they received military flight training, their crashes and injuries should come under industrial statistics, not military ones, even taking into account that military planes were more complex and prone to failure.

17 posted on 01/03/2016 2:33:01 PM PST by rlmorel ("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Shameful, but not surprising.


18 posted on 01/03/2016 2:33:08 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
And here I thought the article's title was alluding to

White
Anglo
Saxon
Protestants

22 posted on 01/03/2016 2:44:52 PM PST by ducttape45 (Obama's legacy - Christianity outlawed, America shamed, morality destroyed. Need I say more?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Not enough Blacks in the WASPS,and the racists in the Obama coven can’t have that.


23 posted on 01/03/2016 2:48:19 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I have a simple solution by presidential decree or law enacted in congress allow only world war 2 combat vets to be buried and when the last combat vet dies officially close Arlington burial.


27 posted on 01/03/2016 2:53:39 PM PST by PCPOET7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
But earlier this year, then-Secretary of the Army John McHugh reversed course and ruled WASPs ineligible.

What was he thinking? Those brave women deserve to be with the brave men.

34 posted on 01/03/2016 3:09:40 PM PST by Mike Darancette (CA the sanctuary state for stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
WASPs not being allowed burial at Arlington

Yup; this title sure sucked THIS honkie in!!

40 posted on 01/03/2016 3:13:13 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Oh... those WASPs.

Bad enough, but: The title had me believe that Arlington had been completely AA’d to the exclusion of all white veterans.


41 posted on 01/03/2016 3:13:27 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I will be there someday. 4th section of the Columbarium bottom row. Reserved in 1997 when my husband’s ashes were placed there. The area for ashes is now a huge long area around the border of the cemetery. Proves they CAN build a wall!!There is a lot more border that can be used too...


48 posted on 01/03/2016 3:40:05 PM PST by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

62 posted on 01/03/2016 4:10:46 PM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This country comes up with the most bizarre and useless decisions PATHETIC!


75 posted on 01/03/2016 7:10:31 PM PST by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I thought perhaps White Anglo-Saxon Protestants were being denied burial at Arlington.

Then again, under this administration...


81 posted on 01/04/2016 9:14:36 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson