Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Hilariously Claims She Didn’t Ask for Classified Info to be Sent Over a Non Secure System
redstate.com ^ | 1/8/16 | Leon H. Wolf

Posted on 01/08/2016 7:24:00 PM PST by doldrumsforgop

You really have to hand it to the Clintons. If nothing else, they are some of the ballsiest liars on the face of the earth. If Billy Mays were resurrected from the dead and asked to pitch the latest thing Hillary Clinton is selling, he would no doubt respond, “Sorry, I have my professional reputation to think about.” The facts, of course, are that State Department was forced, virtually at gunpoint, to turn over an email in which Hillary Clinton is discussing getting some classified talking points from one of her underlings. The secure fax on which they were supposed to be sent apparently was experiencing problems, so Hillary said, verbatim, “turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” This is not my interpretation of what she said, these are her exact words, which you can see with your own eyes here.

This particular email is so damaging to the narrative that Hillary has been trying to spin that she was forced to sally forth and offer an explanation to the press. Her explanation? Never happened.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; benghazi; clinton; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; jacobsullivan; jakesullivan; newyork; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: euram

Democrats also booed Almighty God at their convention.


41 posted on 01/08/2016 9:55:03 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop; Jmouse007
She has 377 days to get her conviction in time to make it happen

Also:

May Almighty God prevail in this instance by preventing and postponing the indictments, trial and sentence until AFTER IT is too late for Emperor Obamessiah and his “Injustice Department” to interfere or issue a “pardon” to her Heinous, Hildabeast. Tagline, because only HE is able.

None of that matters, Obama can pardon her in his last minutes in office whether or not she has been charged indicted or convicted of any crime.

He may pardon her for any crime or crimes she may have committed.

Gerald Ford opened up that can of worms when he pardoned Nixon, exactly in that manner.

42 posted on 01/08/2016 10:05:05 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
True.

Maybe Hillary is trying to say, "I didn't ask for it to be done, I ordered for it to be done." I mean, it's a possible semantic explanation for how Clinton's statement might be technically true . . .

43 posted on 01/08/2016 10:06:27 PM PST by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

If it weren’t for a biased and sycophantic media, Hillary’s running for POTUS would be a joke. An honest media would have exposed her long ago as a liar and would be digging into the obvious corruption at the Clinton Foundation. However the media did the same for Obama


44 posted on 01/09/2016 12:56:00 AM PST by The Great RJ (�Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.� Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Think about this.If she were indicted and Sanders was the candidate it would be like conceding the election. Zero chance Obama allows that no matter his feelings about Hillary personally. As much as i’d like to wake up and read her diary from prison every day it simply cannot be allowed.
I posted in anther thread about all the filing deadlines that have passed. At think point those running are it. It’s simply too late for Biden. Obama will do whats best for his party under the guise of he can’t allow a Republican to win the White House.
I want to be wrong in worst way but Obama simply will not allow it.


45 posted on 01/09/2016 1:08:32 AM PST by wiggen (#JeSuisCharlie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

Yea, there are some conservatives who are optimistic, but I don’t know what this is base on. Obama is corrupt.


46 posted on 01/09/2016 1:28:14 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: euram

“Democrats have no shame. Even if Clinton was convicted and imprisoned, they would still vote for her.”

Democrats ALONE won’t get her elected, no matter what they do and the best case “voting irregularities” are only worth maybe 5%.

Independents who vote Democrat could... but they aren’t going to vote for someone referred for indictment or actually indicted.

How much of this is “wishful thinking”, I don’t know.


47 posted on 01/09/2016 4:01:31 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

“I posted in anther thread about all the filing deadlines that have passed. At think point those running are it. It’s simply too late for Biden.”

Deadlines? Rules? These didn’t apply when Torricelli was damaged goods in New Jersey and Lautenberg came off the bench. The party and the courts will do whatever they want.


48 posted on 01/09/2016 8:36:11 AM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NYFriend

Seriously, I don’t think Hillary knows how to print from a computer so she wanted faxes. Converting it to “nonpaper” was probably her way of saying “just send it electronically so I can at least read it even if I don’t have a paper copy.”

The fact that she used the term without explanation in the email would indicate that she’d used it before and expected Sullivan to know what she meant.

And again, everyone is assuming that the email in question indicates that she was telling him to declassify it and send it non-secured. It’s entirely possible (I think highly probable) that all she was saying was send the damned things to me electronically but remove the heading so prying eyes couldn’t easily spot them as talking points.


49 posted on 01/09/2016 9:54:51 AM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Norseman
"Non-paper" has a very specific meaning in diplomacy. See this reference. It has nothing to do with electronic copies of anything.
50 posted on 01/09/2016 10:03:02 AM PST by thesharkboy (posting without reading the article since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Bingo. She’s toast.

L


51 posted on 01/09/2016 10:16:50 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

What really happened is George Bush actually got on her computer; and sent the email asking to strip the classified footers and send the information unsecured.
He secretly flew to Washington in a SR-71 to do this and kept the flight under wraps.

Yes it really wasn’t Hillary.


52 posted on 01/09/2016 10:21:59 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Your reference states that a “non-paper” is a summary of the Talking Points actually delivered summarized by someone at the presentation. I guess that could make sense. The heading of the email could indicate the subject that the Talking Points covered, and were delivered to, and in their absence (because the couldn’t be faxed to her securely), she asked that someone prepare a summary (a non-paper) of the points delivered since she couldn’t receive the Talking Points themselves.

That’s all assumption, of course, as is the assumption that the resulting non-paper also needed to be classified, but that she ordered the classification stripped.

Look, Hillary belongs in jail, or at least needs to be booted from office, and the Dems are crazy for nominating her as their presidential candidate. But there’s a whole lot of assuming going on as regards this particular email exchange. That’s all I’m saying.


53 posted on 01/09/2016 12:29:21 PM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

I think we’re in agreement about this. There isn’t enough information here to determine whether she ordered classification markings stripped or not. What we do know, however, is that she set up a system whereby 1300 classified documents were mishandled outside the approved, secure channels of the federal government. That’s a lot of felonies.


54 posted on 01/09/2016 2:26:34 PM PST by thesharkboy (posting without reading the article since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Agreed. She belongs in jail. But perhaps not for the reason being assumed in this thread. A lot of assumptions are being made, all of which could be incorrect.


55 posted on 01/09/2016 3:46:41 PM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
The State Department has said it has been unable to find any evidence that the document in question was emailed to Clinton. The fact that it was meant to be sent through a secure fax does not necessarily mean that it was classified, the agency said.

http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-says-she-did-not-classified-information-email-173622785.html

So they are covering her either way. They won't release any classified emails so we won't see any evidence if the doc was classified. Then she can lie like you point out. Or State Dept will show us an unclassified email and say this was the one she was referring to.

56 posted on 01/10/2016 4:41:31 PM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I just have a sick feeling she is going to skate away from this scott free=-


57 posted on 01/10/2016 8:44:27 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson