Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shankbear

Why does Cruz qualify ? Because he says he does?


7 posted on 01/09/2016 9:02:50 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mollypitcher1
Here's Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Like most immigrants, he does a job Americans won't: defending the Constitution.

The Naturalization Act of 1790, let's read it !

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled,

11 posted on 01/09/2016 9:10:23 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: All; Mollypitcher1; shankbear

“Why does Cruz qualify ? ....”

Here’s why Cruz qualifies:

“....his mother was born and raised in the United States. The law in effect then, and now, made Ted Cruz a U.S. citizen at birth.”

Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/sen-ted-cruz/2013/03/11/spokesman-senator-cruz-us-citizen-birth#ixzz2cCNiCjP8


13 posted on 01/09/2016 9:29:57 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mollypitcher1

Mother born in USA. US citizen living somewhere else while retaining citizenship having a child, child is US citizen. Non issue.


20 posted on 01/09/2016 9:49:42 PM PST by shankbear (The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mollypitcher1

You really do have a problem with reality but this discussion is not about that dead horse issue.

It’s about Trump attacking Cruz and Cruz being a classy gentleman about it.

Tells me a lot... does it tell you anything?


41 posted on 01/09/2016 10:45:44 PM PST by altura (Cruz for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mollypitcher1

By the standards of the Constitution he is not “natural born”. Under natural law of the time, which the Constitution is based on, you had to be born in the country.

There is no reason to have a premium “natural born” requirement in the Constitution if it can be applied to multiple countries at once.

That being said, by the standards of our time, in a global age, the Supreme Court would probably have a loser definition of natural born


68 posted on 01/09/2016 11:42:38 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson