Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Hillary Clinton really worried about Bernie Sanders all of a sudden?
Hot Air.com ^ | January 10, 2016 | JAZZ SHAW

Posted on 01/10/2016 2:43:41 PM PST by Kaslin

While much of the ongoing evaluation of the Democrat primary remains both hypothetical and anecdotal until we start counting some votes, I can say with 100% certainty that Bernie Sanders has two big fans in my household. One is my wife, a Democrat who really likes Bernie for the next president and despises Hillary Clinton to the point where she suggested one evening (after a glass of brandy) that she might even vote for Trump over the former First Lady. The other, of course, is me. I still have to believe that running an avowed socialist on the Democrat ticket would be essentially an unbeatable plan for electing any of the Republicans currently under consideration. But thus far I’ve never really believed that Bernie would get within smelling distance of the nomination and, as far as I can tell, neither did Hillary Clinton.

Oh, she talked a good game to be sure and sent out her surrogates to all the talk shows, proclaiming that they respected Sanders and expected a tough battle, but nobody in Clintonland seriously thought Bernie was going anywhere. So has that changed? If you listen to Liz Kreutz at ABC News, they’d certainly like you to think so.

The most blatant sign came earlier this week when Clinton’s campaign manager Robby Mook sent a fundraising email to supporters with the subject line “nervous.”

“There’s a situation developing in Iowa and New Hampshire that could change the course of this election,” Mook wrote in the e-mail, noting that Sanders’ campaign is outspending Clinton in TV ads in the two early states.

Two days later, the campaign sent another fundraising email mentioning the “(seriously!) tight” polls in New Hampshire.

Mildly alarming your donor base in an effort to squeeze out a few more dollars is nothing new in politics at any level, so those sorts of missives don’t give much of an indicator in my opinion. But I did perk up my ears (at least a little) when I heard a recording of Clinton herself calling in to one of the MSNBC evening gab festivals. (CNN)

For months, Clinton’s campaign declined to get into regular exchanges with Sanders and his aides. Clinton herself waited months to even say his name on the campaign trail. The offensive stance was on full display on Friday night, when Clinton and her aides let loose on Sanders on guns.

“When it really mattered, Senator Sanders voted with the gun lobby and I voted against the gun lobby,” Clinton said, taking the unusual step of calling into MSNBC’s “Hardball.”

She accused Sanders of saying one thing and doing another and called on him to “introduce legislation to repeal the immunity that was given to gun makers and sellers.”

So does that make it real? Is Hillary Clinton really starting to hear footsteps behind her and doubting that the Democrat base will send her into the general election? Sorry, but I’m still not buying it. The Clinton machine has been at this game for a very long time, and while not always successful, they know how all of this works. Sending a few signals to keep her donors and base voters on their toes is actually fairly typical. Yes, the polls indicate that she’s in a very tight race in both Iowa and New Hampshire, but that’s all. There was a time (pre-internet) when most folks had little idea what direction a race was taking until the first two states voted and a surprise winner coming out of either of them (or both) could translate into a huge swing in the standings. As far as I can tell, those days are pretty much over. The entire country gets CNN, MSNBC and Fox, as well as having online access to the major newspapers and the campaigns themselves. Voters are settling on their candidates everywhere, not just waiting to see what happens in Boise or Nashua. Bernie is doing well in those two states because he’s essentially lived there and flushed all of his money into them. Once you leave New Hampshire, Bernie is nowhere to be seen in the polls and Clinton absolutely knows that. One or two early losses would be embarrassing, but it’s nothing she can’t overcome with a big string of wins in the following few weeks.

If Hillary Clinton is worried about anyone these days, it’s not Bernie Sanders. It’s an as yet unnamed person from the FBI who might be knocking on the door asking her about the magical, disappearing document classification headers revealed in her emails. She’s busy claiming that there’s no there there, but it’s as unlikely of an explanation as could be imagined. If anything is going to change this race it would be a sudden arrest, not that I find it likely to happen with Obama’s people in charge of the Department of Justice. Yet it does leave us with one interesting exit question today: if you win the election but the inauguration is scheduled for a day when you’re in prison, do they let you out for the ceremony or does John Roberts need to go down to the jail to swear you in?

sanders-point


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: Maryland; US: New York; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2ndamendment; arkansas; banglist; berniesanders; democraticprimary; democrats; election2016; guncontrol; hardball; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; martinomalley; maryland; msnbc; newyork; secondamendment; vermont; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Kaslin

Her poll numbers are going to sink over the next 4 weeks. Bernie will win this thing.

Pray America wakes


21 posted on 01/10/2016 3:01:00 PM PST by bray (Trump/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well, here’s a personal report from “The heart of darkness”, Cambridge MA ;-)

Lately, I haven’t heard anyone one bring up Hillary, but have heard several saying they wish Bernie would win.


22 posted on 01/10/2016 3:01:46 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If she isn’t, she should be. All I’m seeing from the lefties around here are Bernie bumper stickers. I’ve seen only one Rodham Clinton bumper sticker since she threw her pantsuit into the ring and it was on a car from out of state.


23 posted on 01/10/2016 3:01:47 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Bernie Sanders. The Marxist DemocRATS' Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Bernie will win Colorado.


24 posted on 01/10/2016 3:01:47 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Instead of ‘running’ for president, Hillary should kick back, run her hands through her millions, snag a classy chick that doesn’t mind being pawed and chawed on by a fat old broad, and enjoy life.


25 posted on 01/10/2016 3:02:42 PM PST by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Whether She Who Must Not Be Named is worried or not is beside the point. The rest of the Dems are worried they’re going to be stuck with Bern and are sounding out such luminaries as Slow Joe, Lizzie “Fauxcahontis” Warren, and heaven help us, John Effin’ Carrie. It has come to that.


26 posted on 01/10/2016 3:02:55 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The one most surprised by a Sanders nomination would be Sanders himself.

He was told he'd just be the sacrificial candidate to run against Hillary this time to make her look middle of the road in comparison, and to carry out the pretense that she actually had to fight it out in the Democrat primaries.

27 posted on 01/10/2016 3:04:50 PM PST by Wissa (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No.


28 posted on 01/10/2016 3:10:14 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“nervous.”

It’s called a fundraising tactic. Saying “hey I’m gonna win easily” doesn’t encourage people to donate.


29 posted on 01/10/2016 3:12:25 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Every leftard I know, sadly I know a number of them ranging in age from old to young, are all for Bernie. It’s possible there is a Hillary person or two, if so they don’t say anything though. The Bernie people are enthusiastic enough I have to avoid somewhat so I don’t see the idiotic memes on facecrack.


30 posted on 01/10/2016 3:14:11 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: visualops

I really think the lefties aren’t buying what Clinton’s “media” toads are selling. I think it’s going to be 2008 all over again. The DemocRATS’ “war on wymyn” is going to continue.


31 posted on 01/10/2016 3:19:32 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Bernie Sanders. The Marxist DemocRATS' Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
The (RAT) establishment will be in full panic mode as even they are not crazy enough to want a full-blown socialist

But now, not only the Washrag (mayonaise hair) but also the Hildabeast CANNOT tell you the difference between a socialist and a RAT.

32 posted on 01/10/2016 3:20:29 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Plan B: The establishment will attempt to “occupy” Bernie

http://bit.ly/1RtAOyU


33 posted on 01/10/2016 3:46:18 PM PST by nomoba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is Elizabeth Warren waiting in the wings if Hillary is gone?


34 posted on 01/10/2016 5:52:38 PM PST by IM2MAD (IM2MAD=Individual Motivated 2 Make A Difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IM2MAD

It is pretty late to the game for Fauxcahontas now. Name recognition and all, doncha know. Nobody knew Bernie, either, but he has been out there now for several months.


35 posted on 01/11/2016 2:25:31 AM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson