Posted on 01/11/2016 4:41:50 AM PST by Dave346
Even Iran's ayatollahs must be amazed at what they have gotten away with since last July's Vienna deal, which purportedly eliminated their nuclear weapons program. The mullahs now act like they call the shots on the deal and throughout the Middle East. Trashing the Saudi embassy in Tehran, “spontaneous†in appearance only, is just the latest evidence, recalling a 1979 “spontaneous†demonstration that resulted in U.S. diplomats held hostage for 444 days.
Barack Obama repeatedly acquiesces in Iran's egregious behavior; President-in-waiting Hillary Clinton shows no sign of breaking with him or the Iran policies she initiated as Obama's secretary of State.
The administration's latest act of appeasement is to delay new sanctions against Iran for its ongoing ballistic missile development work. This retreat is inexplicable except as part of a desperate effort to keep the Vienna agreement alive no matter what the costs or risks to America and its friends.
For our country's safety, the Obama-Clinton appeasement of Iran must be central in voters' minds as they consider candidates for president this November.
Cataloguing Iran's recent provocative behavior would produce a long list, including firing rockets dangerously near U.S. warships; threatening reprisals against us for tightening visa requirements against states engaged in terrorism, like Iran; and Tehran's chutzpah-heavy charges that Washington is breaching the Vienna agreement. Iran is pushing to speed the arrival of “Implementation Day,†when long-standing restraints imposed because of its nuclear-weapons efforts begin disappearing, unfreezing over $100 billion of assets and lifting economic sanctions.
To obtain these benefits, Iran is taking the limited, easily reversible steps the Vienna deal requires, like reducing the number of operating uranium-enrichment centrifuges and transferring low-enriched uranium to, of all places, Russia. Simultaneously, however, it has repeatedly flouted innumerable prior assurances about the “peaceful†nature of its nuclear efforts.
(Excerpt) Read more at triblive.com ...
I believe the term is “Appeasement Weasel”.
How about John Bolton for Sec State under President Trump or Cruz?
I suspect the next president will be too late. If, as I believe, Hussein is trying to enable and trigger an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel, that could well occur this summer. Yes, I think Iran already has a few warheads.They also have Korean and possibly Russian help in putting them on missiles. I doubt they can reach NYC or DC yet so it may be better that they attack soon before the are able to launch a side shot at the US at the same time.
That is one reason I prefer Trump to Cruz. Trump is more likely to have his way with an opposition Republican Senate. Make no mistake- the Republicans in Congress, if they are, indeed still a majority, will fight a Conservative President bitterly. Then again, I am not confident that Republicans will retain a majority in either house, anyway. Most of them- almost all of the Senators- have shown themselves totally unworthy of re-election. Conservatives may vote for ostensibly conservative new blood just because they are not nominally Democrats but there will be no enthusiasm, even for new conservative, because voters understand that conservative candidates become Chamber of Commerce Democrats as soon as they take their seats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.