Skip to comments.
Press Release: Rep. Mia Love says Consider Bills ‘One Subject At A Time’
Utah Policy ^
| 1/11/16
| Staff
Posted on 01/12/2016 9:07:09 AM PST by Baynative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
"Members of both parties have made a habit of passing complex, thousand page bills without hearings, amendments or debate," Rep. Love said. "That process and the collusion that goes with it are why we are $18 trillion in debt and why the American people have lost trust in elected officials."
1
posted on
01/12/2016 9:07:10 AM PST
by
Baynative
To: LucyT; Publius; Kaslin; BenLurkin; Nachum; Cincinatus' Wife; Biggirl
It's called
HR 4335 and it deserves widespread support. The time to end earmarks, riders, and lobbyist addendums is long over due.
2
posted on
01/12/2016 9:12:00 AM PST
by
Baynative
(If socialist democrat ideas are so good for people why must they be mandatory?)
To: Baynative
There is a better device I cooked up back in 1985. Invest the power in the vice President or the Speaker to divide bills into pieces. When an issue comes up that is contentious, divide it off and let them put their names on it. When there is little argument, don't clog the proceedings with endless votes.
I call it a "cedo" from the Latin meaning "to cut in two," as with a sword.
You heard it here first. ;-)
3
posted on
01/12/2016 9:13:30 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Despotism to liberalism: from Tiberius to Torquemada, and back again.)
To: Baynative
No riders - EVER! Every bill is a single item piece.
To: Baynative
Press Release: Rep. Mia Love says Consider Bills âOne Subject At A Timeâ Excellent! Long overdue. Will probably never go anywhere, but at least she's trying to move things in the right direction.
5
posted on
01/12/2016 9:20:51 AM PST
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Baynative
Did she vote for the monster budget deal? Say one thing...do another.
6
posted on
01/12/2016 9:20:54 AM PST
by
vmivol00
(I won't be reconstructed.)
To: Baynative
7
posted on
01/12/2016 9:21:18 AM PST
by
OKSooner
("Once you come to terms that Obama's not on America's side, everything he does makes sense.")
To: Baynative
Well, whaddya know? Upon posting that, I went and looked, because the last time I thought about this seriously there was no Internet. Turns out, my Latin dictionary from so long ago was positing an etymological origin, but not a translation per se. “Cedo” means to cede, which does involve an act of separation but it probably not the most precise of terms because it implies yielding. “Abscido” is probably a better term: to cut off, to separate, take away. I’ll ponder that some time, if and ever I have any.
8
posted on
01/12/2016 9:21:31 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Despotism to liberalism: from Tiberius to Torquemada, and back again.)
To: Baynative
Ooh, I like this. Way overdue.
Bills so simple even a senile congressman can understand them would be even better.
9
posted on
01/12/2016 9:22:22 AM PST
by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: vmivol00
You are correct, her fig leaf has wilted and a weed has choked the stem!
10
posted on
01/12/2016 9:26:17 AM PST
by
goodtomato
(I'm really, really blessed!)
To: Carry_Okie
Meh. King Solomon came up with that solution AGES ago, LOL! ;)
11
posted on
01/12/2016 9:26:21 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: Baynative
I KNEW there was a reason that I sent this woman some $ during her campaign.
Go, Mia! GO!
12
posted on
01/12/2016 9:26:58 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: Baynative
Article IV, Sections 19 and 20 of the Indiana Constitution provide:
Section 19. Every act shall embrace but one subject and matters properly connected therewith; which subject shall be expressed in the title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof as shall not be expressed in the title.
Section 20. Every act and joint resolution shall be plainly worded, avoiding as far as practicable, the use of technical terms.
These need to be incorporated into an Amendment to the United States Constitution. I would add the provision:
“All citizens of the United States are conferred standing to contest violations of this Amendment through the process of Judicial Review.”
13
posted on
01/12/2016 9:29:20 AM PST
by
henkster
(Hillary Clinton's supporters are beginning to realize they are fettered to a corpse.)
To: vmivol00
She did vote for the omnibus package and she has taken a lot of flack for it -A LOT. But, you have to consider what kind of pressure is put on a freshman member when the speaker takes them aside and tells them if they don't go along the party will invest millions to elect a replacement.
I think she went along with the majority and is now fighting back. Regardless - GOOD FOR HER.
One bill, one subject, one page. I've asked her to add that when voting members should be required to swear they read the bill. (I know ...I know)
14
posted on
01/12/2016 9:30:54 AM PST
by
Baynative
(If socialist democrat ideas are so good for people why must they be mandatory?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Don’t forget that she supported Boehner as Speaker.
15
posted on
01/12/2016 9:34:33 AM PST
by
chae
(The Lannisters send their regards--Game of Thrones)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Is this the same Mia who voted for Obama’s tax bill? Who would listen to her anymore.
16
posted on
01/12/2016 9:36:40 AM PST
by
ladyjane
To: Baynative
Well it's a wonderful thought, but window dressing unfortunately.
When the human beings populating Congress had integrity they sent up bills as line items. They figured out that was too empowering of the President and "fixed" things with all-or-nothing kitchen sink piles-of-paper.
Anything fixed in Congress via this method she proposes can be undone just as quickly. Reagan fought for a line item veto for his entire time in the White House and they told him to pound sand.
Not saying she shouldn't try, maybe the conversation would be helpful, but she has no juice down there. If she had Ryan and McCarthy on her side it would help. If they refuse she could make a big stink about it ( but I'll bet she won't ). She could get external expertise from Gingrich and other alumni and start a movement.
Alas, these things are only going to get solved through We The People setting new iron-clad rules for Congress and the entire FedGov through a series of Amendments. It is the only way to be sure. However, I fear it is too late.
To: Baynative
To: BitWielder1
You mean like Thad Cochran.
19
posted on
01/12/2016 9:52:11 AM PST
by
taterjay
To: Baynative
She’s right, of course. But that isn’t the way the insiders do it.
20
posted on
01/12/2016 9:55:40 AM PST
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson