Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Happens if Hillary Isn't Indicted?'
pjmedia.com ^ | 1/19/2016 | Roger Simon

Posted on 01/20/2016 9:32:12 AM PST by rktman

Just when we were thinking it couldn't get much worse with Hillary's email scandal, an inspector general's unclassified letter to lawmakers tells us the former secretary of state was keeping the most classified of all intelligence material -- beyond "top secret" -- on her homebrew server.

Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillarycriminalprobe; indictments; topsecretemails
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: rktman

The Democrats will have an avowed Socialist/Communist for its nominee.


61 posted on 01/20/2016 10:22:43 AM PST by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Please participate in the Free Republic Caucus 01/20/16

If you already have, thank you.

LINK

62 posted on 01/20/2016 10:23:09 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EDST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karliner
-- That in itself is planned well thought out treason no matter the depth of the secrets. --

You probably know this, and use of "treason" was hyperbole (which hyperbole I endorse). But technically, until she gives that material to a declared enemy, it isn't treason.

63 posted on 01/20/2016 10:23:28 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

I like your way of thinking !


64 posted on 01/20/2016 10:25:04 AM PST by nevermorelenore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Bad blood and no love lost.

He beat her down once and he will do it again.

65 posted on 01/20/2016 10:25:44 AM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
If she isn't indicted before the first presidential debate, then whatever Republican candidate is on stage with her should make a citizen's arrest of her on national TV.

Her Secret Service detail might help him put her in chains.

66 posted on 01/20/2016 10:25:55 AM PST by Stentor ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute." Robert Goodloe Harper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LS

There certainly are classifications beyond Classified. If you were read into a program, that means you were in the highest category, what laymen call “Eyes Only”, but pros call SCI (compartmentalized Top Secret) Clearance. Did you get an SSBI?


67 posted on 01/20/2016 10:28:13 AM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS

The levels of classification are determined by the amount of damage to national security would be caused by the loss of the material. Material that would cause grave damage, loss of personnel, or economic harm is classified as Top Secret. The Secret classification goes to material that could cause serious damage to security. Confidential is the lowest but still poses security concerns. The USAF officer who gave you that bullshiite explanation was a moron and has no business explaining anything pertaining to security classifications.


68 posted on 01/20/2016 10:32:00 AM PST by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS

Top Secret is high......but much higher if “a need to know” is added.(only a very select few can have access.)


69 posted on 01/20/2016 10:32:19 AM PST by tankrlm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"When you're a Democrat, it's just different.

Talk show host Jim Quinn


70 posted on 01/20/2016 10:34:42 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Never heard of being read into a program - we were just given (1966) million dollar FBI background checks - now days that’s done with a phone call to people you list as contacrts - whoever they are does not matter, only the positive response - all so I hear.

Classification was who had access if they needed it, by designation -eyes only -elint -3 levels of TS code word, and so on.


71 posted on 01/20/2016 10:35:30 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS

Oh yes they do - or did up until Clinton became President and changed everything to make getting a clearance far easier, cheaper, and faster - “Say ‘hello’ Mr Snowden!”


72 posted on 01/20/2016 10:37:50 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: refermech

“Actually it would be kind of fun to see Trump do just that at their first debate.”

It would be but don’t count on it. He will be dancing with Madame President at her Inagurual Ball. After all he thinks she is terrific and has said so many times.


73 posted on 01/20/2016 10:39:08 AM PST by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on behalf of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Wasn’t your clearance TS-CW?


74 posted on 01/20/2016 10:41:14 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

And they are just the beginning ... for beginners :)


75 posted on 01/20/2016 10:42:22 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LS

Spent 20 years in the intel business before returning to higher ed eight years ago.

Sounds like you got a somewhat misleading definition from your SSO.

Levels of classification reflect the sensitivity of the material and the damage it would cause to national security if that information was revealed. In that sense, there is a discernible difference between the disclosure of “confidential” data, versus something classified at the Top Secret/SCI level.

Your clearance (and need to know) determines your access to the vast majority of classified information. The amount of material covered by Special Access Programs (SAP) remains relatively small, by definition. If most classified was covered by various SAPs, the mechanics of reading people into the program and debriefing them would be a massive headache, to say the least.

That’s why SAPs are typically reserved for our most sensitive collection efforts—known by a relatively small number of people, and with the material/databases segregated from the vast “haul” of intel information. Many SAPs are actually “housed” in a separate vault, inside a Sensitive Compartmented Intelligence Facility (SCIF).


76 posted on 01/20/2016 10:43:26 AM PST by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Maybe.


77 posted on 01/20/2016 10:46:34 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PIF

6994 SS VN and 6990 SS Kadena


78 posted on 01/20/2016 10:48:39 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rktman

President Ankle Bracelet bump.


79 posted on 01/20/2016 10:49:34 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman


80 posted on 01/20/2016 10:54:09 AM PST by MacNaughton (" ...it is better to die on the losing side than to live under Communism." Whitaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson