Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Happens if Hillary Isn't Indicted?'
pjmedia.com ^ | 1/19/2016 | Roger Simon

Posted on 01/20/2016 9:32:12 AM PST by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: rktman
At some point this thing must ballon over Hillary's head. Sooner or later. Either in this life or for sure in the next.

I have a gut feeling that Hillary will get the business from Obama, somehow.

I also have another gut feeling that Obama is not going to want to leave his nest.

I dont know when or how but something is gonna happen that she ain't gonna like.

21 posted on 01/20/2016 9:44:58 AM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Never heard of that explanation, when I was in we had to read the Top Secret targets and flight info prior to going on alert. Top Secret Burn before reading.


22 posted on 01/20/2016 9:45:10 AM PST by boomop1 (Term limits is the only way to change this failed government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Then I’m looking for “de plane, de plane” because I think there is a better than 50% chance she does face charges. Don’t forget, Obama hates the Clintons and definitely prefers someone other than Hillary to continuee his programs.


23 posted on 01/20/2016 9:45:46 AM PST by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

Ok, then the explanation I was given wasn’t accurate. Thanks.


24 posted on 01/20/2016 9:47:11 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

True.


25 posted on 01/20/2016 9:47:20 AM PST by griswold3 (Just another unlicensed nonconformist in am dangerous Liberal world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rktman

What will happen: The FBI will refer for prosecution, the DOJ will, ‘Take it under advisement’, the Press will go into propaganda mode and explain how, ‘Everyone does this’, and it will slowly go away.


26 posted on 01/20/2016 9:47:24 AM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I already know my gov’t is corrupt. This should remove all doubt for all.


27 posted on 01/20/2016 9:50:38 AM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Maybe the BIG POWER people in DC have FBI files ( or better) on each other and they’re telling themselves that for ‘the sake of the country’ they’ll have to give each other passes.

That’s the wrong choice.

That’s the wrong choice.

The really really wrong choice.

(and it won’t work)


28 posted on 01/20/2016 9:51:00 AM PST by GOPJ (It's more important to have a gun in your hand than a cop on the phone- Florida Sheriff Grady Judd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

When I was in the army, I had a Secret security clearance. This allowed me to deal with fairly routine equipment and information (like weapons capabilities) necessary to do my everyday job.

I knew a guy who had a Top Secret clearance. This allowed him access to more specific information about people or projects. In particular, he had been tasked with reviewing information that gets declassified at benchmark time periods, to make sure there was nothing too sensitive being released. For example, when JFK’s presidential papers were released, a guy like him reviewed every document first.

Then there was a level above, I can’t remember the real name, but it was called ‘compartmentalized’ or ‘need to know’. It meant that you couldn’t access the information about a certain project, unless you were working on it and had a genuine need to know something. Kind of like terrorist cells, theoretically people working on small parts of a project don’t know about the larger project or parallel small projects.

There may be levels beyond that, that we in the public do not know about.

However, since I left the army, I know the levels have changed. You may remember that Clinton’s chief of WH security was a bouncer from Arkansas who had no business being within 20 miles of sensitive information. So, Bubba overhauled the entire system, and included provisions that allowed this guy to stay as part of the overhaul.

Now, if you were on a particular program, I’m not sure what that means. Generally, getting a security clearance takes several months and involves background checks and even interviews of relatives and co-workers. It sounds like you were on one project and never really given a blanket clearance.

A small tid-bit: When I applied for a Secret clearance, I had to fill out a questionnaire about past associates, drug use, etc...and swear under penalty of law that it was true. At that time, one of the questions dealt with homosexuality - apparently the army thought that could be a security risk (ie Bradley Manning). But you may occasionally notice a story about a high ranking officer who comes out of the closet, in our new gay friendly military. This means that these officers most likely lied/falsified information on their own security clearance applications...repeatedly, as they periodically expire and must be renewed. Yet they are celebrated.


29 posted on 01/20/2016 9:53:18 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS
So there are actual terms like top secret? I knew about NORORN, but never saw anything not just marked secret/classified.

Absolutely

30 posted on 01/20/2016 9:56:02 AM PST by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LS

At least between 1967 and 1970 my experience in the AFSA was that there are officially 3 classifications, Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret, just as we have always heard. Within those classifications were more levels that are based on “need to know” which puts several levels above TS in real life. I was one level above TS and I knew that there was at least one level more restrictive than mine and I suspect levels more restrictive still. It was TS that there were levels above TS


31 posted on 01/20/2016 9:57:17 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One; lacrew

Thanks all. Seems I was misinformed.


32 posted on 01/20/2016 9:57:28 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Thanks. I just held classified.


33 posted on 01/20/2016 9:58:04 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One
+1. I had a NATO Cosmic security clearance when I was in Germany, and reverted back to Secret when I departed. Although I was Army, I was on an AF base those four years. During certain situations, I'd be tasked to be a Liasion Officer to the Wing Commander.

Truthfully, I don't recall ever seeing any TS documents.

During one exercise, I was briefing the WC on our positions around the base. The evaluators dropped an NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical warfare) input on us, and his expert overreacted. It was right in my wheelhouse, as I was my unit's NBC officer. I spoke up, made the right recommendation, WC agreed with me, as did the evaluators.

For the duration of his command, I was called whenever there was an NBC input.

34 posted on 01/20/2016 9:58:08 AM PST by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LS

The information you’re looking for is here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information#Top_secret_.28TS.29


35 posted on 01/20/2016 10:00:02 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin
Don’t forget, Obama hates the Clintons and definitely prefers someone other than Hillary to continuee his programs.

He's still a Democrat, and she was his SOS. It would bad for him if such a thing happened.

By the way, you forget a very important point. If he were to have Hillary indicted, it would open up the possibility for him to be indicted. The Democrat wall protects them all. He's not going to pierce that.

36 posted on 01/20/2016 10:00:35 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I'll believe it when the US Marshals are dispatched to cuff and stuff.

Occam's Razor: If you see her cuffed, the most likely answer is a hallucinogen contaminated your food.

37 posted on 01/20/2016 10:01:54 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I'll believe it when the US Marshals are dispatched to cuff and stuff.

Occam's Razor: If you see her cuffed, the most likely answer is a hallucinogen contaminated your food.

38 posted on 01/20/2016 10:01:56 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Sadly, I agree. I have watched her since 1992 break all sorts of laws with impunity!


39 posted on 01/20/2016 10:02:14 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
.
Did Lois Lerner get indicted?

How about Susan Rice?

No DC insider is indicted.


40 posted on 01/20/2016 10:02:29 AM PST by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson