To: JudyinCanada
"Question is, why is Ailes so obsessed with Kelly? Why does she have so much power at Fox? Sheâs not that good, and sheâs totally enamored with herself."
Ratings? I don't know other than that. She isn't good at being a journalist.
This is the "serious journalist" practicing being serious.
76 posted on
01/27/2016 8:11:48 AM PST by
CodeToad
(Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
To: CodeToad
My wife asked me why I call this b!tch a strumpet and I said ‘pictures’.....she asked why and I pulled up the GQ Spread (heehee) and said. “Well, here. Here’s her credentials - her bona fides, so to speak”
She laughed her ass off and said “I’ve NEVER seen these pictures. I see what you mean now.”
101 posted on
01/27/2016 8:18:08 AM PST by
Gaffer
To: CodeToad
You know, I've been on this site for a LONG time, I can very clearly remember when every time someone posted an article by Ann Coulter (back when she was conservative) or any other good looking conservative female commentator, that everyone would holler about "the rules" - which meant the original poster was supposed to also post pictures of the commentator in question, preferably the most sexy pictures possible.
But because Megyn Kelly opposes Trump, everyone here is trying to call her a slut for doing the same thing that most cheered women like Coulter for doing. Just more evidence that Trump support follows no logic or reason, just emotion. Anyone for Trump - good. Anyone against Trump - bad.
103 posted on
01/27/2016 8:18:28 AM PST by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
To: CodeToad
Don’t spoil that pic. It’s really the only reason why I cut Megyn any slack at all.
To: CodeToad
Braaaaaapppppttthh. So that is how you spell it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson