To: pgyanke
No, he was not a "natural born" citizen at birth, just a citizen.
There is a difference.
34 posted on
01/27/2016 10:32:28 AM PST by
GBA
(Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
To: GBA
No, he was not a "natural born" citizen at birth, just a citizen.There is a difference.
I laid out an argument with facts. For example, I pointed out that the US Government considers him to be a natural born citizen. Why? Because he was eligible to be a US Senator without any naturalization. You presented an opinion without facts to back it up.
There is a difference.
42 posted on
01/27/2016 10:34:58 AM PST by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: GBA
Feel free to find a founding era or even notional example of your claim in law.
74 posted on
01/27/2016 10:48:09 AM PST by
Bidimus1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson