Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release
Fox News ^ | 01/29/2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela K. Browne

Posted on 01/29/2016 11:31:25 AM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-167 next last
To: glorgau

“Foreign intelligence services have undoubtedly read them already.”

Exactly right. So if they are so damaging, arrest the perp already.


101 posted on 01/29/2016 1:46:34 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Emails are almost impossible to delete. Somebody sent and somebody received. Not to mention that those servers are backed up (or should be)

Email can live indefinitely.


102 posted on 01/29/2016 1:50:14 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

Obola simply has to be at the center of it. With all the super cyber geeks in this criminal organization called the Administration, there’s no way he could have not known that all of her emails, in and out, were going to an illegal server. Knowing that, he was required by the Constitution’s take care clause to stop it and prosecute the perpetrators, but he didn’t. That makes him a traitor, along with the Witch and Huma.


103 posted on 01/29/2016 1:50:38 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems

“Not necessarily, if by ‘too damaging to release’ they mean ‘too damaging to Hellary’s presidential ambitions’...it all depends on what the meaning of ‘too damaging’ is is!”

Well at least we should stop hearing the BS excuses from the Felon/State Dept. that documents were not considered classified at the time. Just no way that flies with SAP documents.


104 posted on 01/29/2016 1:55:18 PM PST by DAC21 (.z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Ouch. Good point.


105 posted on 01/29/2016 1:55:20 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: DAC21; All
Well at least we should stop hearing the BS excuses from the Felon/State Dept. that documents were not considered classified at the time. Just no way that flies with SAP documents

I doubt that will stop them from continuing to claim it...truth means less than nothing to these 'people'
106 posted on 01/29/2016 1:59:10 PM PST by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: C210N

These emails came from the State Dept. that Hillary so kindly turned over to them. The FBI has the emails she deleted from her home server.


107 posted on 01/29/2016 2:03:59 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888
These emails are being released to the FBI by the State department.

They are being vetted by the State Department and the intelligence agencies. The State Department is releasing them to the public as part of a FOIA request from Judicial Watch. The FBI investigation is separate. They already have all the emails Hillary allowed us to see. In fact they have the electronic copies from a thumb drive held by her lawyer, David Kendall.

Every Hillary email has a recipient, a sender and possibly people copied. All these people weren’t using the server in Hillary’s basement.

You are missing the point. The classified system and the unclassified system in the State Department are totally separate, physically and electronically. In order to migrate classified information into the unclassified system, you need to download the materially and literally cut and paste in order to get it on the unclassified system. It is a felony to do so.

Hillary's private server was able to communicate with the Department's unclassified system thru the emails. State Department personnel on the classified system could not send or receive emails from Hillary's private email account or server.

All or most of these emails exist in other archives, that’s how arrogant and stupid they are.

Not necessarily. Hillary could have sent emails to private individuals outside the State Department like Blumenthal. Clinton said that there was no need for her to provide the State Department with the emails from her server because they already existed in government archives from the people who either sent or received emails to and from her. This was not true since Huma and her other aides have private email accounts outside the State Department system.

It is quite conceivable that Abedin or Mills or Sullivan could have downloaded classified material from the classified system, then printed them out removing the classification markings, and scanning it into a private email account for transmission to Hillary. The only way you could find out that was happening would be to match the Hillary emails to the source material that was transmitted via the classified system, probably from another intelligence agency like the CIA or NSA. No doubt when this material was vetted with the intelligence agencies, they discovered that the information came from them.

I spent 28 years working for the State Department and 8 years for the Navy. If I had ever done anything like this, I would be in jail. It is unbelievable how this happened or why the State Department ever agreed to allow her to have a private server period. Hillary is going to take down a lot of people with her.

108 posted on 01/29/2016 2:16:25 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: B212

What security clearance did the small IT company in Colorado have
that Hillary gave the entire server too? The answer is ‘none whatsoever.’

Felony!


109 posted on 01/29/2016 2:18:46 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Enough is enough.

+1

110 posted on 01/29/2016 2:32:20 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

111 posted on 01/29/2016 2:39:55 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

If Lynch does not press charges then the FBI should do a press release stating how they believe charges should be brought forward, but will not due to Lynch playing politics etc.

Now can the Congress do frigging anything to Lynch and others about this cover up?


112 posted on 01/29/2016 2:41:26 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

White house is now saying Clinton was or is not the target of the investigation. HUH.

She is the prime culprit here , so how the hell can she not be the target of the investigation?


113 posted on 01/29/2016 2:42:38 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
My guess now is that the meeting between Sanders and Obama, was to let him know that Biden will be entering the race.

This report isn't from our side, it's theirs. I had gone on record that i though a Hilary indictment was about 10%, but with recent developments now I am upping that to about 60%..

114 posted on 01/29/2016 2:46:06 PM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

Agree on all points.


115 posted on 01/29/2016 2:46:15 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Here is an interesting question. If they are so classified and confidential, how can they be used as evidence in court? Her defense attorney may counter that redactment is inadmissible.

Then what?????

116 posted on 01/29/2016 2:49:18 PM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Earnst said today that from what we know now, she will not be indicted.

Catherine Herridge said that elements in the FBI and DoJ were very upset with those statements because Earnest has no line into either agency to know one way or the other. She also said Ubama didn't either when he made similar statements.

117 posted on 01/29/2016 2:55:28 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

According to a report just made on Fox Hillary is already counter-attacking with that strategy. She is demanding that these emails be released to the public.

She knows they won’t since they are “too damaging to national security.” She’s going to try to bluff her way through this.


118 posted on 01/29/2016 3:18:18 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
She knows they won’t since they are “too damaging to national security.” She’s going to try to bluff her way through this.

One solution-

War Tribunal

119 posted on 01/29/2016 3:20:46 PM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Excuse me, I meant confidential congressional War Tribunal with prosecutory powers.

This is precedent setting enough to dictate it.

120 posted on 01/29/2016 3:22:58 PM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson