Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After 40-year ban, U.S. starts exporting crude oil
CNN ^ | 01/29/16 | Matt Egan

Posted on 01/31/2016 3:19:31 AM PST by Enlightened1

America is wasting little time getting back into the oil exporting business.

Just weeks after Congress lifted a 40-year ban on exporting oil, the first shipments of the black stuff left U.S. ports for Europe.

The first freely-traded shipments of U.S. crude are symbolic of the country's newfound role as a leading producer of oil. America's entry into the world market can also be viewed with relief by those worried about potential supply disruptions. After all, many big oil producers are located in volatile parts of the world susceptible to geopolitical shocks.

"The fact that producers have free access to the global market will make it easier for U.S. supply to respond to disruptions around the world," said Jason Borduff, a former energy adviser to President Obama who is currently a professor at Columbia University.

America officially banned exports in 1975. It came two years after an OPEC oil embargo that banned oil sales to the U.S. had sent gas prices skyrocketing. Newspaper photographs of long lines of cars outside of gas stations became a common and worrisome image.

Fast forward 40 years and the world has changed drastically, with booming U.S. oil production from the shale revolution creating an epic supply glut that recently sent oil prices below $30 a barrel.

Some of that American oil is now finding a home overseas. On New Year's Eve ConocoPhillips (COP) and NuStar Energy (NS) announced what they said was the first exports of U.S.-produced light crude oil since the ban was lifted. The companies shipped oil pumped from the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas.

Other shipments believed to be containing oil pumped from the U.S. have left for destinations in Europe in recent weeks as well.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ban; crude; energy; exporgting; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Darksheare
"Would be better off refining it here and using it to reduce our dependence on foreign oil."

Correct, oil is a valuable finite resource, America loses and the billionaire Marxist globalists win, again.

21 posted on 01/31/2016 6:00:25 AM PST by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

“Oil companies agree to a plan for a CO2 tax and, bada boom, oil companies can now export oil”

That turns my stomach. If you have a source, I’d appreciate a link.


22 posted on 01/31/2016 6:01:38 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Oil companies and the congress are committing a huge faux pas with very little to gain in return. Politics and economics are forever intertwined. The public relations nightmare this is causing is not worth the little (tiny )extra profit. Idiots.


23 posted on 01/31/2016 6:06:10 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Excellent post.

Frankly, the only good rationale that I can imagine for government intervention in export/import markets is national security.

If Reagan (or Cruz?) were President, he might take the very actions we are taking so as to undermine our enemies. As it is, we can credit our oil producers, and hydraulic fracturing, with upsetting the OPEC apple-cart.


24 posted on 01/31/2016 6:09:49 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Right with you on the gut feeling on this.
Baraq has a pattern of harming our country.
He allowed this to go forward. Since we don’t know all the real reasons behind this, it is safe to assume that it will be detrimental to us.


25 posted on 01/31/2016 6:32:47 AM PST by Texas resident (The democrat party will destroy our country and they think they won't be affected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Would be better off refining it here and using it to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

Wrong kind of oil. It is a myth invented by the media that oil is completely fungible. Most of our refineries are designed to expect a higher grade of crude oil than we produce here. So we'll be buying foreign oil no matter what, at least until we can get the Democrats to let us build new refineries.

The fact that we couldn't export oil for so long has been a deterrent to domestic drilling, which in turn has contributed to our global trade imbalance. Isn't governmental economic management wonderful?

26 posted on 01/31/2016 6:55:59 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
...is that Obama allowed it to happen,

I think technology stole a march on the communist-in-chief and this is happening despite his efforts, not because of them.

27 posted on 01/31/2016 6:59:15 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Exporting it now when the price is at a historic low does not seem very smart.


28 posted on 01/31/2016 7:27:20 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
we increased our dependence on foreign oil over the past eight years

Not at all.

Looking only at crude oil imports, we reduced our imports by 23% from 10.1 mmbpd to 7.8 mmpbd.

4-Week Avg U.S. Imports of Crude Oil
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=WCRIMUS2&f=4

But the reduction in our total NET petroleum imports and exports, counting products as well as crude oil, the reduction is massive.

61% reduction in net, from 11.2 mmbpd down to 4.3 mmbpd.

U.S. Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MTTNTUS2&f=M

29 posted on 01/31/2016 7:48:28 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
As it is, we can credit our oil producers, and hydraulic fracturing, with upsetting the OPEC apple-cart.

Yes! And US private property laws, along with what's left of states' rights.

30 posted on 01/31/2016 7:50:08 AM PST by wayoverontheright (A falling camel attracts many knives.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham
It wasnt the US supply that did that it was the Saudi actions (and others) to also increase production that made the price so low trying to effect a kill shot on the nascent US industry.

In the past 5 years:
US production grew by 75% (4.1 mmbpd)
Russia Production grew by 13% (1.2 mmbpd)
Saudi Arabia Production grew by 5% (0.5 mmbpd)

http://www.eia.gov/beta/international/data/browser/#?ord=CR&cy=201506&v=H&vo=0&so=0&io=0&start=201006&end=201506&vs=INTL.57-1-RUS-TBPD.Q~INTL.57-1-SAU-TBPD.Q~INTL.57-1-USA-TBPD.Q&c=000000000000000000000000000000000000000500000002&pa=00000000000000000000000000000000002&f=Q&ug=g&ct=0&tl_type=p&tl_id=5-Q&s=

In the past 3 years:
US production grew by 51% (3.2 mmbpd)
Russia Production grew by 2% (0.2 mmbpd)
Saudi Arabia Production grew by 3% (0.3 mmbpd)

31 posted on 01/31/2016 7:51:06 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
I would say why would we export a resource that is a central theme in our national security. Part of the reason we are so concerned with the ME is the fact that there is large oil resources that we depend on. China does not 'pay' to secure that, but we are left to do it. It will be our taxes that secures the safety of those vessels and shipments.

One would have expected our .gov to get rid of regulations and environmental issues to help create more refineries here since the ME is so fragile, we didn't.

Finally, part of the push for the additional Keystone lines from Canadian was for being able to export those resources to higher bidders overseas.

Once oil prices go up again, I wouldn't be surprised if the debate of crude oil comes up again.

32 posted on 01/31/2016 8:08:41 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
higher bidders overseas

It is a fungible market. Why do you believe the US pays below market rates, even lower than cost of moving oil around the world?

33 posted on 01/31/2016 8:19:49 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: thackney
If increased exports lead to lower prices Domestically you will get a nice FR donation in your name. There is some delay in pricing, but say 18 months come back to this. This includes all outside variables, economy, war and such.

Bookmark

34 posted on 01/31/2016 8:35:07 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Your so called representatives are so corrupt and so stupid. Our oil reserve ban for export for a reason — to secure our economy for foreign treat. Especially the oil prices are so low now, there are no incentive for us to sell our oil reserve, except for personal (political manure.)


35 posted on 01/31/2016 9:00:31 AM PST by Libertynotfree (Over spending, Over taxes, and Over regulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“Exporting it now when the price is at a historic low does not seem very smart.”

With prices so low, some of our producers are struggling. Opening up export markets may keep them from going under. It will certainly mean more jobs.

With prices low, I think this is a good time for the US Government to buy domestic oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserves. Again, it helps us producers and their employees, and it gives the country a safety net in case of a future oil crisis.


36 posted on 01/31/2016 10:54:02 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

I think the SPR is maxed out. At least it was a year or so ago when I checked last.


37 posted on 01/31/2016 10:54:57 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: thackney

You da man


38 posted on 01/31/2016 10:57:39 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

And shut down existing refineries as well.


39 posted on 01/31/2016 11:06:35 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“It is a fungible market. Why do you believe the US pays below market rates”

You’ve presented data that shows that the US has been increasing production of oil faster than anyone else. Our producers wanted to export, but it was illegal.

With the increase in domestic supply (that cannot be exported), I would expect US prices to be lower than world prices. On the other hand, decreased imports could match increased US production barrel for barrel, suggesting a world-wide decline in prices. So even if oil were completely fungible, it’s a little bit complicated.

Do you have data on changing oil prices around the world?


40 posted on 01/31/2016 11:11:29 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson