To: Red Steel
Quite frankly, New Hampshire primary is so overrated..I know before the 90’s, no one won the White House without winning NH..but the last three Presidents of both parties have NOT won NH..I lost respect for them when they voted for Pat Buchanan in 96..I know Dole was no prize, but come on..Pat Buchanan???? Just give Clinton the re-election..it’s a very beautiful state, but it really needs to be ignored..imho
11 posted on
02/02/2016 6:17:40 AM PST by
BerniesFriend
(I am BerniesFriend, however it's really Bernadette, NOT Bernie Sanders friend!!!!!!!)
To: BerniesFriend
Iowa doesn't pick the nominee either. We need to change the two beginning states.....maybe Utah and Delaware One for republicans and one for Democrats. That seems the best way to do this. It is weird that Iowa and New Hampshire get to go first every cycle especially when neither ends up really doing a great job picking our nominee.
To: BerniesFriend
Both McCain and Romney won NH and were the Republican nominee the year they won. So I don't think it's quite as overrated as you try to portray it.
To: BerniesFriend
Well if you don’t believe NH then SC is a notorious bellweather state. If Trump wins there then what do you say?
72 posted on
02/02/2016 3:47:25 PM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson