Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leo Carpathian
That article by the Post & Email is hardly irrefutable as it fails to bring the one fact, the ONE legal litmus test by which one is either natural born or naturalized and that is “expatriation”. Did or did not the child at birth, have a foreign nationality they would have to renounce upon their coming of age.

It just irks me when these pundits claim that their conclusions are irrefutable, when in fact, they are very much refutable.

46 posted on 02/03/2016 7:18:28 AM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: patlin

What about all those children born on US Military bases overseas, some only have 1 US Citizen parent some 2. But they have dual citizenship at birth, they must renounce 1 before coming of age. Step Daughter had both Japanese and US Embassy BC’s. And a US Passport by the time she was 3 days old. US Foreign Military bases are NOT US SOIL. She had to be reminded of the fact she had to renounce the Japanese citizenship when she became of age.


56 posted on 02/03/2016 7:49:31 AM PST by GailA (any politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson