To: NYRepublican72
Personally, women shouldn’t be in combat roles, ie Infantry. However, the only way we are going to get a reasonable push back against this is having women signup for the draft.
7 posted on
02/07/2016 6:59:30 PM PST by
PJBankard
(It is the spirit of the men who leads that gains the victory. - Gen. George Patton)
To: PJBankard
Bullshit. It was simply an executive order to put them into combat roles. Another executive order can undo it. Just takes the guts to sign it. That’s all.
14 posted on
02/07/2016 7:07:19 PM PST by
DesertRhino
("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
To: PJBankard
'Personally, women shouldn’t be in combat roles, ie Infantry.'
Which is the problem. The point of being in the military is to kill and conquer your opponent. As in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is no defined areas of combat, the entire country is a combat area, yet we put women there. If you join the military, it is for combat, expect it and be part of it, or not be allowed to join. There are other areas, ie the peace corps.
17 posted on
02/07/2016 7:22:01 PM PST by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
To: PJBankard
End Selective Service forever.
19 posted on
02/07/2016 7:23:38 PM PST by
Theophilus
(The GOPe are dealers. The Marxist Democrats are duelists.)
To: PJBankard
Personally, women shouldn’t be in combat roles, ie Infantry. Infantry, no. I'd be comfortable with the idea of putting a good female pilot into an A-10.
47 posted on
02/07/2016 8:43:19 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson