Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugin

“but if there’s a draft I see no reason why they shouldn’t be subject to the draft on the same basis as men”

But in order to be “fair,” the draft should be split, 50/50 women/men.

That fair and equitable split would thereby, by necessity, require ALL combat jobs to be filled with women in order to fill the ranks, and that means physical standards must be reduced, meaning “women standards” for all men and women.

Once that 14th Amendment equal protection lawsuit is filed by the wimpy feminist “male” insisting women must face the same draft he does, a whole bunch of equal protection arguments will flood the courts and the military. And that will destroy our military. After all, that is the ultimate aim of obozo and his sycophants.


35 posted on 02/08/2016 2:35:14 PM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Hulka

The crime is that “equal protection” has been turned into the de facto ERA amendment. Why did the left ever want an ERA amendment if everything they needed was already in the Constitution? Phyllis Schafly said the ERA would mean women being drafted and same-sex marriage would be made legal. Now the court has made “equal protection” mean the same thing as the ERA. Which opens up everything Schafly warned would happen if the ERA was passed.


57 posted on 02/08/2016 2:57:32 PM PST by JediJones (Marco Rubio: When the Establishment Says Jump, He Asks How High?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson