Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would a Brokered Convention Stop Donald Trump?
breitbart ^ | 14 Jan 2016 | Roger Stone

Posted on 02/09/2016 9:22:42 PM PST by dennisw

Will the GOP establishment steal the 2016 nomination from Donald Trump even if the magnate arrives in Cleveland with the most pledged delegates but short of the 50 percent he'd need to be nominated?

Is a back-room deal in the works to have a "brokered convention" to deny Trump the GOP nod? I think there is such a plan and it must be exposed.

Donald Trump is our last hope to make Washington work for us - not the lobbyists, special interests and billionaire donors who control the corroded two-party system. As Trump says: "America is going to hell!"

I am a veteran of nine national Republican presidential campaigns, including the floor of the 1976 Republican National Convention for Ronald Reagan. My sources inside the Republican party are warning me:

The insiders have a stunning plan to stop Trump even if he wins the primaries.

The plan involves stalling Trump short of a majority on the first ballot, since many of the delegates pledged to him would no longer be legally bound to support him on subsequent ballots. There are many, many Trojan Horse delegates inserted by the GOP establishment who could bolt from Trump after that first ballot.

Remember, up until March 14 all primaries have proportional delegate allocation. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) 97% , Chris Christie, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) 79% , Jeb Bush and the rest will be winning delegates, too.

There are 278 Super Delegates who are GOP establishment insiders, likely opposed to Trump. They constitute 4 percent of the convention. Thus, Trump must win 54 percent of delegates elected in caucuses and primaries to guarantee he could block a plot to stop him.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; brokeredconvention; bush; caucuses; gope; primaries; superdelegates; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: SampleMan

You are DELUSIONAL; living in your own twee bubble.


41 posted on 02/09/2016 10:05:16 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

S.C. IS a winner take all state; as are the rest of the states after the SUPER TUESDAY ones.


42 posted on 02/09/2016 10:06:37 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dadfly
He can't go Indie now.

Good grief...I wish more people here knew the rules!

43 posted on 02/09/2016 10:08:00 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

>>No it wasn’t a serious question, it was a smart ass one.

Ok.

>>Here’s your serious question, do you have a problem understanding how people who voted for the clear leader will react if your little scheme comes true?

I don’t have a scheme. I’m referring to math: it takes 50% +1 delegates to win the nomination.

>>>Do you think they will all just go ahead and vote for Rubio or Jeb or some such?

I’m not a supporter of either, but if I’m willing to vote for whoever the nominee is against the progressive, er, democrat candidate is, I hope supporters of other GOP candidates will correspond.


44 posted on 02/09/2016 10:08:54 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

But he won’t do that; he’s going for the GOP nomination!


45 posted on 02/09/2016 10:09:24 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gg188

Roger Stone and his then wife Ann Stone were the founders of Republicans for Choice dedicated to the removal of the pro-life plank in the Rep. party platform.


46 posted on 02/09/2016 10:09:41 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
They can NOT do that! It is now against the rules and too late to have a rule change.

Actually, the RNC has a meeting a week or two before the convention, and they can change the rule if they choose. And since it is up to the party to decide how they select their nominee, there is not even anything a court could do about it (I mentioned this because I know how Trump likes to threaten to sue). Legally, they could pass a rule before the convention saying that the vote of the delegates will just be considered advisory, and that the RNC would select the nominee, and there is nothing anyone could do about it.

47 posted on 02/09/2016 10:10:18 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

I won’t vote for jebbie nor Rubio and many others won’t either.


48 posted on 02/09/2016 10:11:12 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
S.C. IS a winner take all state; as are the rest of the states after the SUPER TUESDAY ones.

There is so much wrong with that statement. There are actually only about 12 true winner take all states (and SC is not one of them). The rest are either proportional, or what is considered a "hybrid". That is, the winners of each congressional district get three delegates per district, and then there are additional state level delegates that either all go to the state winner, or are awarded proportionally. SC, TX, CA all award their delegates this way.

49 posted on 02/09/2016 10:14:05 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican

You’re uninformed, uneducated, have terminal TDS, and wear a blindfold and ear plugs.


50 posted on 02/09/2016 10:14:12 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

If there is a brokered convention they will make sure Trump wins.


51 posted on 02/09/2016 10:14:50 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Yeah, I know. Been there, done that.


52 posted on 02/09/2016 10:15:14 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I think that you’re wrong.


53 posted on 02/09/2016 10:16:16 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
-- I think that you're wrong. --

I sure hope I am, on the people being asleep enough. But I'm pretty sure I am right about the RNC not having fire in the belly. It's content to be the minority party, the role it has held for the better part of two generations.

54 posted on 02/09/2016 10:20:26 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

A brokered convention is the last gasp effort for the GOPe to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. I see them playing every trick in the book to sustain the political money system that fattens their wallets. The only problem is that The Donald will continue to educate the American People about the cesspool America’s center of power has become. The Potomac has been a putrid swamp for too long.


55 posted on 02/09/2016 10:23:46 PM PST by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
I almost refused to hold my nose, yet again, for Romney, but did it at the last moment.

I am NOT doing it for jebbie nor Rubio nor KaSICKO !

56 posted on 02/09/2016 10:26:27 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

There are an awful lot of VERY angry people now; this is different from other times.


57 posted on 02/09/2016 10:27:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Yeah, that worked out well - for Obama.

Sorry, we both know where this conversation goes.

I wish you well.


58 posted on 02/09/2016 10:29:13 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

It’s interesting to me that the powers that be continue to overlook that reality. Maybe they believe we will huff and puff and then slink away. How very wrong they are, there is sheer fury out here, I hear it and see it daily.

Also, do the Cruzbots believe for nanosecond that IF the RNC pulled off this stunt, that the red carpet would be rolled out for Cruz?

And where or where is little Reince?!


59 posted on 02/09/2016 10:30:32 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative; nopardons

i hope you’re wrong. i’ve been told by experienced candidates here that it’s possible that trump can prepare multiple slates of electors in some states. i’ve also been told he can also run as a write-in as well. i’m not an expert by any stretch, but i’ve researched one such state myself and it certainly seemed doable.

he certainly has the resources to prepare, and i think he’d better if he can. not only for this year, but in succeeding years as well. his prep now could become the seed of a new conservative party.


60 posted on 02/09/2016 10:30:55 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson