Posted on 02/12/2016 9:49:05 PM PST by TigerClaws
Despite a clear warning received almost three years ago, it has taken a heated presidential campaign and an FBI investigation to make us aware of the national security threat of Hillary Clintonâs unsecured state department e-mails. The Kremlinâs cyber warfare army has had ample opportunity to steal Clintonâs entire e-mail cache (including 31,830 âprivateâ e-mails). Such hacking would likely have taken place before the Kremlinâs propaganda arm, RT (Russia Today), published Sidney Blumenthalâs e-mails to Clinton on March 20, 2013, presumably sending out alarms at that late date to Clinton to secure her private server.
The Clinton cache of e-mail correspondence in the hands of the Kremlin or other hostile intelligence agencies could represent one of Americaâs greatest intelligence disasters, giving Vladimir Putin the opportunity to determine the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election or, barring that, to cast a cloud over a Clinton presidency. The national security implications of Hillary Clintonâs cavalier approach to security far outweigh the legal consequences of her actions.
The timeline of the Clinton e-mail scandal raises eyebrows about the curious lack of interest in this story when it first broke:
In March 2013, the Romanian hacker âGucciferâ distributed four intercepted Blumenthal e-mails, relating to Libya and Benghazi, to news organizations and political figures throughout the world, but only RT published them. On their release by RT, I immediately posted excerpts and analysis, concluding that, âUnhappy with the overthrow of Kaddafi, Putin would want to emphasize the sinister role played by the CIA in Libya.â My article, which was picked up by Drudge Report, attracted more than a third of a million viewers who could see for themselves Clintonâs private e-mail address and the contents of Blumenthalâs Libya reports. The RT publication was greeted by almost total media silence.
EXCERPT PER PUBLISHER REQUEST
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
It depends on what the meaning of the word “if” is.
Ehh, no it has taken the MSM that long to start reporting on it because she is Hillary Clinton, she is a democrat and Barrack Hussein Obama is in office.
AND, the GOPe will aid and abet the above in any way it can.
He doesn’t need them. All he has to do is support democrats and they will finish the job Obama had started..
If?
I can't see him doing that since blackmailing a newly elected president would be more beneficial to him........
They also have her Yoga routines and details about Chelseas wedding.
In all seriousness though I hope we have been able to save our humint assets.
I think she sold those emails to Putin and to the Chinese, too.
Folks what other Secretary Of State would sell its supply of Plutonium to its enemy?
Hillary did,then coincidently her husband then gets millions in speaking fees,The Russians have her e-mails,Bank On It.
Better to defend getting speaking fees and be a crook,than to defend being a traitor and are being blackmailed.
Happened before,when presented with the choice of defending selling giving our missile technology to China for campaign contributions,or getting blow jobs in the oval office,well the rest is history repeating itself
Do you suppose the Israelis do?
This last sentence from the article shows how out of touch the author really is. Hillary epitomizes the arrogance of L'Etat, c'est moi and would get a chortle reading such a line.
Maybe Putie will reveal Hillary’s Valentine to Huma....
President Clinton would be blackmailed
Yes.
She probably bcc’d him anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.