Posted on 02/18/2016 3:19:08 PM PST by Kazan
Well he just threw out the biggest bone we’ve EVER seen a presidential hopeful throw out.
He really is trying to top Cruz with his “100% pro-life” profession.
We could use more of this kind of competition between the two.
% | reason given for having abortion |
21 | can't afford baby now |
21 | unready for responsibility |
16 | concerned about how having baby would change her life |
12 | has problems with relationship or wants to avoid single parenthood |
11 | is too immature or young to have child |
8 | has all the children she wanted or all children are grown |
3 | mother has health problems |
3 | other |
3 | possible fetal health problems |
1 | doesn't want others to know she had relations or is pregnant |
1 | husband or partner wants her to have abortion |
1 | rape or incest |
0.5 | woman's parents want her to have abortion |
Trump has taken the position of being pro-life. Period!
The truth of the matter is...Roe vs Wade should never have happened. Murder is murder.
I agree. I could care a LOT less about the Supreme Court. SC nominations matter a great deal to me.
Cruz really is a talker and not a doer.
Thank you for expressing your opinion. I don't agree with it.
Trump is a wheeler-dealer, not a leader. That, he has in common with Mitch McConnell.
Oh you are Cruz. How funny. You know you took my sentence and made it as bad as you can. You know I was talking about Cruz’s work on the Supreme Court. But if you must be Cruz then there you go. No surprise.
Thank you for referencing that article Kazan. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.
While I admire Trumps good conservative intentions with respect to overturning the Supreme Courts state sovereignty-ignoring ruling concerning abortion, patriots need to keep in mind the following.
Patriots need to support the next conservative president by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will be willing to impeach and remove state sovereignty-ignoring, pro-abortion activist justices from the bench.
If he wheels the right deals, then he’s great. A lot of this is going to depend on who else steps up to this plate. This didn’t happen in a vacuum, I bet. Someone discussed it with Donald. Someone who might stand to be nominated for sainthood, proverbially speaking.
Stick your finger in the air today and this is what you get. The real question is who will be in the White House.....and that is the problem. He is all over the place with what he supposedly stands for today compared to yesterday. Does this guy have any real stances? What is truth with this guy?
Lol two Corinthians ping.
I have a bridge to sell to anyone who believes this.
One of the judges (Diane Sykes) Trump mentioned as a possible SCOTUS appointee has a questionable history with life:
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/10/23/appeals-court-blocks-indiana-law-to-defund-abortion-providers/
I wouldn’t trust Trump on anything he says about anything.
I do not.
I don't either!
I am convinced the only way we end abortion is to make a world where no one wants one. The first step is a thriving economy. I don’t think Trump will abandon us but more importantly I think legislators won’t act as needed to get anything to trump.
Yeah that's the ticket!
No, Cruz has forgotten that pro-life has to be holistic.
You can’t make that go away by filthing Donald Trump.
We should have no room for idols around here.
A holistic pro-life view would address the issues which aren’t even economic but spiritual.
Don't expect it to rain sodie water on the Big Rock Candy Mountain.
They are spit and the people he respects least are the target. It's tragic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.