Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Review: Jeff Sessions Is a ‘Prostitute’ for Endorsing Donald Trump
Breitbart ^ | March 1, 2016 | Matthew Boyle

Posted on 03/01/2016 6:09:09 AM PST by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last
To: stephenjohnbanker

It is sad what it has been reduced to.

Got to give them credit though, they’re willing to kill the brand over their conviction.

And a conviction it is... (GUILTY!)


161 posted on 03/01/2016 8:57:21 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I’ve been watching them on FB for the entire election season. NR has become more and more unhinged by the day. This latest is not surprising.


162 posted on 03/01/2016 8:59:27 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Somewhere along the way, NR stopped selling my name and address to other Enterprises. They also stopped sending me subscription renewal forms and requests for money.

I used to so look forward to their journal arriving in my mailbox, and they just lost their minds.

163 posted on 03/01/2016 9:04:01 AM PST by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

The National Enquirer will not be bankrupt in 12 mos.

Pray America wakes


164 posted on 03/01/2016 9:04:27 AM PST by bray (Trump/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I doubt that NR, being for open borders and all, has much love loss for Sessions anyway (so they’ve probably been looking for an excuse to trash him) but this is over the top. For me, a Cruz supporter even, it’s unacceptable to use such terminology to describe his endorsement of Trump.

It was disappointing to say the least he endorsed Trump, shocking really, but calling him names and ascribing cheap motives to the man isn’t going to get anything. It was a loss, period, that he endorsed Trump. A surprising let down but a loss that simply must be acknowledged as such and shouldn’t be explained away with easy invectives. It should be accepted as an adult accepts loss and moves on. He’s just as unimpeachable as Cruz, in terms of his conservatism and morals, to state anything less is sour grapes in the extreme.


165 posted on 03/01/2016 9:11:26 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Sad to see this.


166 posted on 03/01/2016 9:14:25 AM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConfidentConservative

Trump isn’t the first one to deal with illegal immigration. Many others including Cruz have been fighting this battle a long time. As I said Trump has been noiser and focused on it more. Trump makes deals. Cruz wouldn’t agree to phony amnesty deals and would just enforce the border and undo what Obama did. That would be better than any Trump “deal” IMO


167 posted on 03/01/2016 9:15:29 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I cancelled my subscription to National Review when Buckley died.

Rich Lowery is a little fag.

168 posted on 03/01/2016 9:53:59 AM PST by blam (Jeff Sessions For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The prostitute crack against Sessions was way over the line.

The rest of it was pretty accurate.

169 posted on 03/01/2016 9:57:40 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
NR is betting that they are right. Either that Trump will lose in the the general, or if he wins, a lot of conservatives are going to be very surprised/disappointed at what he does as President.

It will then be a chorus of "we tried to warn you...."

170 posted on 03/01/2016 10:01:09 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I’ll take CRUZ’s record up against TRUMPS any day... neither are perfect, but CRUZ will nominate a true CONSERVATIVE to the SC.


171 posted on 03/01/2016 10:02:39 AM PST by pollywog ( " O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Who sang that song as the nation was melting down in 2008?

N O B O D Y !

Who knows, maybe Trump will spend eight years in office, and we’ll have to spend trillions to bail the nation out, when he’s done.

Please remind us what our elected officials in Washington have done for us since January of 1989.

Tell me again how I need to vote for another Washington insider who lies.

NO!


172 posted on 03/01/2016 10:05:19 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: All

That’s the way to do it! Call all the supporters you will absolutely need to get your rino in office a bunch of rats and sell outs.

The reason we’re voting for Trump is because we’re not selling out. I sold out n 2008 and again in 2012. Never again, you Nation Review rat bastards.

I wasn’t planning on voting today. But I went in and voted for Trump. There were at least 5 times as many republicans voting as there were democrats. I VOTED FOR TRUMP! That’s one more Texas vote that he didn’t know he was going to get.


173 posted on 03/01/2016 10:30:31 AM PST by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I would love for Trump to win and announce that every day there will be a press secretary telling Americans what’s going on PLUS it will be on the internet.

“The press can go to the web page and get what they’re going to write for today. This way if they lie anyone can go back to the webpage and check for accuracy.”


174 posted on 03/01/2016 10:33:05 AM PST by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This from the group that is pimping for the eGOP.

Whore mongerss with no moral compass


175 posted on 03/01/2016 10:35:37 AM PST by Syncro (Benghazi-LIES/Coverup Treason ARREST the traitors! Hillary-Obama-Rice-Holder-Learner-Lynch et al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You don't have to be a Washington insider to lie. Trump swore up and down to GOP primary voters that he was going to round up and deport 11 million illegals.

He told the NYT something different.

176 posted on 03/01/2016 10:44:26 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

And you’ve heard the tape?

Please link me to that. Thanks in advance.


177 posted on 03/01/2016 10:50:10 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Oddly, McCain actually sponsored a bill in 2004 to fix Fannie/Freddie, and warned they could go belly up and drag down the whole economy. Obama as in the Senate Nate at the time and obviously didn't support the bill.

McCain decided he wanted to run a "positive" campaign, and so made a conscious choice not to point fingers regarding the financial collapse.

One of the dumbest political decisions I've ever seen.

178 posted on 03/01/2016 11:00:05 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I’d have to take that bill under advisement, because McCain has never done anything on the up and up in his life.

As for him laying down for Obama, he wanted to be part of history. Oh, you have nothing to fear from this guy...

That’s vintage McCain.


179 posted on 03/01/2016 11:03:41 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya
And unfortunately, National Review probably has a long life ahead of it in the era of Trump.

All the Wall Street and Cheap Labor Express types need a forum to attack Trump and NR will gladly do that for the money.

These people still think they are relevant in the social media era.  Meanwhile, Trump is going to rule the country from Twitter and he will encourage new media to arrive that will counter the anti-revolutionary voices at NR.

But these things will take time to materialize.   You must admit, some of these guys have had quite a run, being pundits since the David Brinkley days.

But a few good guys still contribute to their on-line edition such as Pat Buchanan.


180 posted on 03/01/2016 11:08:18 AM PST by poconopundit (When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson