Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
If that’s true, then why haven’t you started a company that does pass the cost reduction on to the consumer? You would undercut all the other manufacturers and put them out of business...

That is the point why would any of them lower their price. The stockholders would have none of it. The cost savings is small anyway, 3-5% of retail.

I will will start a manufacturing company when you loan me 50 million.

92 posted on 03/07/2016 12:42:04 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

“That is the point why would any of them lower their price.”

Because, as I said, they would undercut everyone who isn’t and put all of their competition out of business.

“The stockholders would have none of it.”

You think stockholders would balk at increasing their market share to 100%?!?

“I will will start a manufacturing company when you loan me 50 million.”

Ok, forget we are talking about you then. Why hasn’t anybody done this, then? Why wouldn’t a single company take advantage of such a ripe opportunity to liquidate all of their competition?


99 posted on 03/07/2016 1:19:55 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson