[Charles Henrickson]

Looks like more than a 140,000 Michiganers had better sense than you.

That's one way to look at it. Another way to view it is that ONCE AGAIN the large MAJORITY of voters in a state REJECT Donald Trump but are split among several candidates.

[MNJohnnie]

And an even larger number of voters rejected Cruz.

[TontoKowalski]

I gotta hand it to you.

You just never give up.

You are annoying. But consistent.

[stocksthatgoup]

That’s one way to look at it. Another way to view it is that ONCE AGAIN the large MAJORITY of voters in a state REJECT Donald Trump but are split among several candidates. \

---

Even more rejected everyone else.

[grey_whiskers]

Another way to look at it, is that an even LARGER majority of the voters reject everyone else...or, to be charitable, the non-"openly"-GOP_e candidate gets 70% of the vote or so, but they can't yet make up their minds

Cruz cannot win this war of attrition. Trump can: the liberal states will not select one whom is easily characterized as a Bible-thumper, when he has as little experience and as little personality as Cruz has.

[eyedigress]

ONCE AGAIN the large MAJORITY of voters in a state REJECT Donald Trump but are split among several candidates.

Ummm, couldn't that be said about ANYBODY in the race? If Cruz got 30% by your logic, 70% hate him.

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

That's one way to look at it. Another way to view it is that ONCE AGAIN the large MAJORITY of voters in a state REJECT Donald Trump

You are bad at math. Trump has almost as many votes as Kasich and Cruz combined. That means the majority of voters rejected Kasich, with Cruz a close second, depending if he keeps his one or two thousand vote lead on him.

[Shortstop7]

Oh puhleeze. Trump won. Deal with it.

[entropy12]

By your logic OVERWHELMING (75%) Michiganders reject Ted Cruz!