Posted on 03/12/2016 1:06:36 PM PST by onyx
Nice catch. Too much to be coincidence.
That video link looks to be an edited zoom version of another that showed the attacker over to the left.
Check other videos of that youtube account to see where they came from.
ideolog..... Loves Islam and Marxism. Hates Liberty, capitalism and America. No money needed except bus fare.
Then who paid his bus fare? It’s so hard to communicate that the “who pays him?” Is the essential question. As soon as the money trail is established, so is a chain of evidence to the Big Guy. At the point, all kinds of legal opportunity emerges.
Ok, maybe I should ask, who is the paymaster?
Legal Scmeagle, mademoiselle.
No time for lawyers. This is a boon to Trump’s campaign. The one thing I wish trump would STOP talking about is litigation.
more pertinent.... who paid his bail?
aider and abettor
His direct, straight forward take-no-prisoners approach. He was his own man then as he is now. Not afraid of what public opinion was/is. Stays the course, not a primadonna, silver spoon mouthed dilettante. Hard worker with vision and drive. He has always had strength of character and I found/find that very attractive in a human being. Not to mention he has the success to back it up.
"Sheesh I hope this is not his father- RummyChick
From your link:
Married Faye Quick DiMassimo. Children: Blake Quck, Nicholas.
Thomas DiMassimo is not listed as one of his children ...unless "Quck"? (shaking head, snickering)
It may be that not all children are listed or that he isn’t a son. I figure someone will check it out.
Peronally, if my son did this I might take his name off a professional page to try to mitigate the damage to me...unless, of course, I encouraged such behavior.
If Faye is his mother there will be backlash on her. Well there might be. She is in Atlanta after all.
You are right, of course. Or so the argument goes. We have heard it in many forms. And it is getting rather old and more than a little shop-worn.
Thanks for the come-back.
“The part about the ISIS connection could be a hoax:http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimdalrympleii/trump-claims-protester-has-isis-connections-but-it-actually?utm_term=.obxaPMjjN#.qmwKgYPPZ";
That report on BuzzFeed is quite convincing, and even Donald Trump seems to be backing down from his initial claim that that dirty hippie that tried to attack him (of whose Leftism there can be no doubt) is an ISIS member or supporter (Trump is now saying “hey, I just said what I read on the Internet” and changed the subject to how the guy is a flag-desecrating scumbag).
So why is this thread still on Breaking News, with a headline that accepts as good the hoax that that Leftist loser is affiliated with ISIS? I’m not asking why the story initially was posted, nor why it initially was placed in Breaking News (before the story was debunked as a hoax, it definitely merited Breaking News treatment), but now that it’s clear that the headline and main subject of the article is incorrect, there’s no way that tbe thread should remain in Breaking News, at least without all-caps text on the title that reads “[UPDATE: CLAIM OF ISIS CONNECTION IS A HOAX].”
BTW, the same holds true for the Breaking News post immediately preceding this one (which also reports the ISIS hoax).
Regarding those headlines remaining in breaking news, I have asked the same question. One would think that the facts and truth would outweigh the propping up of lies for the sake of sensationalism, but that is apparently not the case here any longer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.