Posted on 03/29/2016 2:56:24 PM PDT by Carriage Hill
The Mark Levin Show is on-the-air: "Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles." -- Mark Levin in "Liberty and Tyranny". Welcome to "The Levin Lounge"... Step in and have a virtual FRink. Taking the country by storm, one radio station at a time - and kicking the BUTTS of the competition! Welcome all, to the most FUN LIVE THREAD on FreeRepublic.com! You can call Mark's show: 1-877-381-3811.
So you haven't listened to Levin since you can remember. Yet you know he's a blankety blank. LOL.
Yes "Sod off" classy girl.
Yeah, I used to think he was great.
Now I think he’s feces.
Hope that’s classy enough for you.
Good post.
Headline on Drudge: http://www.drudgereport.com
Trump Fights Back
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b340UaWj_Bw
If Cruz’ guy did the same to say, Michelle Malkin, i bet it would be the same.
The woman was from Dimbart...a Trump supporter.
But still, Cruz’ attitude toward women is not misogynistic.
7:40pm [ speaking of Fields ] "... who by all accounts is a fine young lady..."
All accounts?! Please let one caller bring up Allen West.
Sorry everyone, Mark has made it plain that either he has no real information which means he is speaking from ignorance, or he is intentionally censoring information and that means he is a liar. Lyin' Ted. Lyin' Levin. It is a contagious disease, but like AIDS or Syphilis, you won't catch it if you are diligent and don't expose yourself to it in the first place.
Mark met a woman, in exchange for him getting her son a job, she slept with him. Mark got him a job on the Cruz campaign staff. He is indebted to Cruz. That’s how it works.
Anyway, Mark kept this whole thing a secret. Odd to say the least. But now I am wondering if this is another case like Rush, marrying some adoring fan.
Mark's remaining sycophants won't like to even entertain the thought, but it needs to be asked. Did Mark and Rush cheat on their wives with some fawning groupie? Sycophants will recoil in horror, but it is pretty damn pertinent. These guys were all over Clinton, they tossed Gingrich and Livingston and every other case that made the papers. They have occupied the high road of morality. And now they defend Cruz while keeping a straight face.
We'll probably never know since they both ( Rush and Levin ) have more than enough money to generously settle and force a confidential agreement. Well, I would like to know.
Calls her a crackpot! But says he knows nothing about her.
This, after defending Fields, who he definitely knows nothing about.
Now pulling the 'Do you have a daughter?' comparison.
If it was my daughter, and she was a reporter who invaded a secret service protected candidate's space, I would tell her 'Good. I hope you learned something. Don't act like a fool!' But my daughter would not be that stupid. She would have learned more about hustle and bustle just walking down the subway stairs or down 5th ave her first time. After doing that for years you quite literally laugh at these fools.
And he is wrong that Corey has no say in security. That is part of his job. Mark is literally a fact-free blowhard. He is living in a bubble.
Highly credible former detective and secret service employee manages to explain how serious this is ( despite Levin chopping up his continuity with 'hold on' ). The Arm's length circle of protection, how the invader gets removed whether man, woman or child.
Mark: "there's no death threat from her!" Even more stupider comments besides that one. Pathetic.
He obviously has no clue about the Beck 'knifing' threat prior to this Fields incident. Sorry everyone, Mark is quite literally an idiot, a douchebag. To quote the late great Bob Grant, Mark is now a fake, phony, fraud, liar.
Blinded by his Conservatism religion, clings to the first prophet who comes along claiming him to be the next Reagan. If it wasn't so serious a time in America it would be laughable.
Thanks for the snippets.
Perhaps Levin has gotten a bit too big for his britches. He has a new radio contract and a new TV show and he and his father pushing books......he has enough money, so now he can let his true self shine though. I am so very disappointed in him. I thought he was better than this.....and adding on his sudden bromance3 with that lunatic Beck...all I can say is YIKES!!!!!
As I've said before, I have listened since the very beginning, when he first called in to Rush, then became a semi-regular caller as F.Lee and the official counsel of EIB, and then his periodic subbing in for Rush and Hannity, and then his own weekend show, and then weekly, and finally national syndicated. I have his early books which I am now sorely tempted to re-read to see if I was obviously snowed. I suspect now that they are pretty much college type book reports, cramming up on a subject and then blasting them out.
His credentials as CoS for the great Ed Meese and some lesser jobs in his DoJ sounded strong at first, but the guy had to be around 20-25 years old. It doesn't compute. He sounds more like a glorified intern. Yeah he had Meese on to promote one of Mark's books since he wrote the forward, but I remember the conversation as much less informative than I expected. What is telling is that over all the years he barely talks of what he did. I was fully expecting and looking forward to inside information of the Wedtech takedown of Meese, stuff about Iran/Contra, the betrayal of Robert Bork, and many other things that would involve the great Attorney General. None of this has occurred. Mark has let it slip that he only met the old man ( Reagan ) a couple of times. I now take that to mean two. Probably Christmas party type deals.
We have to recalibrate our expectations with these guys, and none more than Mark and Rush. For example, I don't think Mark is anymore qualified than me or you to start talking about our Constitution. Sycophants will never understand, but 'Constitutionality' doesn't really much intersect with the DoJ who are concerned with statutory law. They employ lawyers and prosecutors and agents, not Constitutional scholars. This is where many of us got sucked in wrongly.
Mark speaks of working for Reagan in 1976, which doing the math means he was a teenager, and that means he was pretty much the same as all of us who volunteered for campaigns. This was a clever résumé enhancement by omission, like pretty much everything else he has stated. Yet somehow working in the Reagan Administration DoJ he managed to miss a lot of stuff, the gradual but steady diminishment of it each day from beginning to end until the 2nd administration which was a disaster. I could see this on the outside, how did he miss it on the inside? I think the reason is that young Mark was very busy, getting coffee and faxing stuff for Meese, and later Thornburgh once the enemy forced Meese out.
The most unbelievable thing to me, which comes up practically every single day now, is how Rush and Mark's knowledge of the electorate is frozen at circa 1984. That was a population of approx 100 million less total people and the makeup was of folks from WWI, WWII, and Korea era sensibilities. The changed electoral map from intentional demographic warfare is extreme and practically insurmountable, yet they insist on running a bible thumping 'true conservative' regardless if the people would ever vote for him! They are dangerous ( Rush and Mark ) to conservatism because when someone like Cruz gets crushed, the GOPe will use him exactly like they did with Goldwater to purge the party of every Conservative. The have no clue that Trump is the best thing for Conservatives because he shields them from blame.
He continually mis-characterizes 1980 as a landslide when it was actually 1984 that meets the better definition ( 50.8% in 1980, Anderson took mostly Carter votes ), and that points to the fact he was not really paying attention at the time and hasn't managed to even look at the results since. Their lack of attention to the horrendous electoral problem we face today is obvious in that he cites polls about Trump v Hillary ( ironic since Carter v Reagan polls were worse! ) rather than mentioning the dozen swing states. Mark couldn't name those 12 states on a bet, nor describe their recent voting record, thus he has no clue that Cruz is dead meat were he the nominee.
It's fine to pontificate in your comfort zone area of expertise, but neither of these guys has any when it comes to electoral objective facts. None. Rush has great instincts, his wheelhouse is pop culture, sports, political correctness, Christian values and common sense. But it goes no further. Once he was accepted as an expert at everything he started making mistakes. Like NAFTA. Dubai ports. Foreign intervention. Everything the Chamber of Commerce and K-Street ever pushed.
Levin has some of that skillset but is far inferior to Rush so that allowed us to project expertise into him, particularly Constitutional matters. That bubble burst 8 years ago when he ( and Rush naturally ) paved the way for Dumbo by punting the NBC issue, and even were to frightened on speaking his middle name and addressing his Marxist ties from his parents and Moslem ties as well. Cruz and Rubio and Jindal and Haley whatshername in SC enter the picture and they are refusing to even entertain the possibility they are all ineligible. The Constitution they give lip service to ( but not military service ) is shoved aside again! Some heroes.
( sorry about the long-winded venting! )
Perhaps Levin has gotten a bit too big for his britches. He has a new radio contract and a new TV show and he and his father pushing books......he has enough money, so now he can let his true self shine though. I am so very disappointed in him. I thought he was better than this.....and adding on his sudden bromance3 with that lunatic Beck...all I can say is YIKES!!!!!
7:06pm segment ...
Mark the Great Big One rattling off nonsense that Michelle Fields is a wonderful conservative reporter, bad guys are looking into her background, yada yada yada.
Sorry Mark. The background is already known. She is the one that pulled this crap already by accusing Allen West of some sexual groping. Mark may remember who Allen West is since he has had him on the air himself. Saint Ted the debater is apparently more believable than Allen West the heroic soldier.
In the earlier segment Mark implied that Trump and his supporters are anti-cop because they have discovered and publicized that this prosecutor is a (D)ummycrat hack. Well Mark, ironically Michelle Fields also has a prior incident when she was allegedly harmed by NYC cops, her fellow hoaxer put an image out there pushing this lie, but in fact she was photographed being helped up by the cops after slipping on her high heels!
Now he is talking about Glenn Beck! Hell has frozen over. Says Beck is being persecuted and smeared. Defending that poor put-upon psychotic nutcase. This one takes the cake because ironically this Fields incident happened immediately after Glenn Beck and his stooges spoke of stabbing Trump repeatedly. Secret Service even visited his radio team onsite. Yep. So Fields approached Trump after that incident ( and just prior to the stage jumper ) and was damn luck she wasn’t tackled.
Marky Mark even played tough guy saying how ‘they would never do that to me’ ( grab his arm ). Yeah, tough guy from Philly. He’s clearly from some cozy little suburb, not the city. We city New Yorkers eat you Philadelphia wussies for breakfast. Embarrassing. But what do you expect when your football team is the pathetic Eagles, who like the Cubbies instills an inferiority complex into local fans. But Mark is much further gone than any of those guys.
How far he has fallen.
If these stories centered on anyone other than Trump, his analysis would be 180 degrees different.
Such irony that he started this TV venture after he alienated what I would venture is at least half of his listening audience...A couple years ago, I would have been an original subscriber. Now, I have no interest—tho I do confess that I sometimes tune in...not because of his self-perceived erudite analysis LOL but to see just how crazy he will get.
Yep. Re-evaluation of the great big one is merited.
As I’ve said before, I have listened since the very beginning, when he first called in to Rush, then became a semi-regular caller as F.Lee and the official counsel of EIB, and then his periodic subbing in for Rush and Hannity, and then his own weekend show, and then weekly, and finally national syndicated. I have his early books which I am now sorely tempted to re-read to see if I was obviously snowed. I suspect now that they are pretty much college type book reports, cramming up on a subject and then blasting them out.
His credentials as CoS for the great Ed Meese and some lesser jobs in his DoJ sounded strong at first, but the guy had to be around 20-25 years old. It doesn’t compute. He sounds more like a glorified intern. Yeah he had Meese on to promote one of Mark’s books since he wrote the forward, but I remember the conversation as much less informative than I expected. What is telling is that over all the years he barely talks of what he did. I was fully expecting and looking forward to inside information of the Wedtech takedown of Meese, stuff about Iran/Contra, the betrayal of Robert Bork, and many other things that would involve the great Attorney General. None of this has occurred. Mark has let it slip that he only met the old man ( Reagan ) a couple of times. I now take that to mean two. Probably Christmas party type deals.
We have to recalibrate our expectations with these guys, and none more than Mark and Rush. For example, I don’t think Mark is anymore qualified than me or you to start talking about our Constitution. Sycophants will never understand, but ‘Constitutionality’ doesn’t really much intersect with the DoJ who are concerned with statutory law. They employ lawyers and prosecutors and agents, not Constitutional scholars. This is where many of us got sucked in wrongly.
Mark speaks of working for Reagan in 1976, which doing the math means he was a teenager, and that means he was pretty much the same as all of us who volunteered for campaigns. This was a clever résumé enhancement by omission, like pretty much everything else he has stated. Yet somehow working in the Reagan Administration DoJ he managed to miss a lot of stuff, the gradual but steady diminishment of it each day from beginning to end until the 2nd administration which was a disaster. I could see this on the outside, how did he miss it on the inside? I think the reason is that young Mark was very busy, getting coffee and faxing stuff for Meese, and later Thornburgh once the enemy forced Meese out.
The most unbelievable thing to me, which comes up practically every single day now, is how Rush and Mark’s knowledge of the electorate is frozen at circa 1984. That was a population of approx 100 million less total people and the makeup was of folks from WWI, WWII, and Korea era sensibilities. The changed electoral map from intentional demographic warfare is extreme and practically insurmountable, yet they insist on running a bible thumping ‘true conservative’ regardless if the people would ever vote for him! They are dangerous ( Rush and Mark ) to conservatism because when someone like Cruz gets crushed, the GOPe will use him exactly like they did with Goldwater to purge the party of every Conservative. The have no clue that Trump is the best thing for Conservatives because he shields them from blame.
He continually mis-characterizes 1980 as a landslide when it was actually 1984 that meets the better definition ( 50.8% in 1980, Anderson took mostly Carter votes ), and that points to the fact he was not really paying attention at the time and hasn’t managed to even look at the results since. Their lack of attention to the horrendous electoral problem we face today is obvious in that he cites polls about Trump v Hillary ( ironic since Carter v Reagan polls were worse! ) rather than mentioning the dozen swing states. Mark couldn’t name those 12 states on a bet, nor describe their recent voting record, thus he has no clue that Cruz is dead meat were he the nominee.
It’s fine to pontificate in your comfort zone area of expertise, but neither of these guys has any when it comes to electoral objective facts. None. Rush has great instincts, his wheelhouse is pop culture, sports, political correctness, Christian values and common sense. But it goes no further. Once he was accepted as an expert at everything he started making mistakes. Like NAFTA. Dubai ports. Foreign intervention. Everything the Chamber of Commerce and K-Street ever pushed.
Levin has some of that skillset but is far inferior to Rush so that allowed us to project expertise into him, particularly Constitutional matters. That bubble burst 8 years ago when he ( and Rush naturally ) paved the way for Dumbo by punting the NBC issue, and even were to frightened on speaking his middle name and addressing his Marxist ties from his parents and Moslem ties as well. Cruz and Rubio and Jindal and Haley whatshername in SC enter the picture and they are refusing to even entertain the possibility they are all ineligible. The Constitution they give lip service to ( but not military service ) is shoved aside again! Some heroes.
( sorry about the long-winded venting! )
Must read! I found the chronology and his age with his job titles especially interesting...Had never really thought about it...Yeah, he is full of bluster about himself as well as everything else.
Thank you for posting :)
Need one that you can use for Rush too. Maybe “troll” is all we need?
Thank you for posting that. I hadn’t really thought about his age, that is really interesting.
One of the things I noticed is when Sundance at Conservative Tree House asked him to let his listeners know about his soon to be son in laws ties to Cruz, the Levin response was anything but normal. All he had to do was state that fact, but instead he offered 5k dollar for info to who leaked the true information. Then he tried to discredit Sundance by saying he was a grocery store manager. Really elitist stuff.
My husband used to listen on his way home from work each night. Now he says he would rather listen to rap. hahahah
Yep, It was despicable that Levin took it upon himself to "expose" the real life identity of this Sundance guy ( wouldn't you love to know the backstory of how he got the info, and also why he would do such a thing! ). He put up a Facebook post with his real name and occupation.
In an age of easy free online searches and paid services, and knowing the batsh!t crazy people allied with Levin like Glenn Beck and the RedState and RightPooperScoopers, this is utterly dangerous.
I may have missed it, but I haven't see Sundance discuss it much, but I have no doubt that Levin caused him some trouble. Marky Mark no doubt lives in some gated community in one of the wealthiest counties in America surrounding the District of Criminals, has enough money for security, yet he sees fit to put a single individual citizen in danger because of his ongoing drifting into insanity which has clearly eclipsed his common sense!
Seriously. That could be interpreted as putting a hit out on the poor kid. If some crazed Cruzer tracks him down and shows up an harms or kills him, Levin is going to be answering questions. He should be answering one right now - who the hell exposes someone's identity like that!
I wonder if the guy had used Publius instead of Sundance if it would have penetrated Levin's fat head not to go there? Surely Mark knows what that pseudonym represents.
Anyway, if that info Levin spilled is correct, he is/was a grocery store manager, i.e., a citizen journalist, as righteous as any citizen farmer or a small business owner IMHO. Pretty much the very spirit of the First Amendment and probably the last line of defense when the system is so thoroughly corrupted from top to bottom. As it is now.
BTW, on the merits Sundance has very good political instincts and credible theories IMHO. I never even heard of CTH until last summer/fall, but he has stuff there on Wordpress back to Trayvon/Zimmerman and good details on the 2014 Mississippi senate theft. All in all, a definite red pill viewpoint, maybe not perfect but far more on-target than most of us trapped in this cozy Matrix that the two parties had constructed.
( I pinged the blowhard holdonnow in case he ever finds the time to log on again. Mark, you have reached the lowest depths imaginable, and you better pray nothing happens to that kid due to your stupidity. )
CH,
This is not directed at you, rather I am using you as the thread originator for my response. That should prevent the soilers from returning.
It’s pretty sad that I can’t even come on a Mark Levin thread without smelling the DUmp that FR has become. All I really wanted to see was his vacation schedule.
I have to wonder, if Mark was able to “fool” people for so many years, how do they know that they aren’t being fooled again by another party? The postings aren’t that indicative of some gain in wisdom....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.