Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/29/2016 10:20:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sanders would raise your taxes by $14,130...

on 100k?!

in lots of cities that’s not a hefty income.

unless dems want to lose control of congress for a thousand years, he wouldn’t come close to getting this.

what a jerk!!

for a guy who’s never held a real job.


2 posted on 03/29/2016 10:29:38 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As a former government employee, and I don’t mean the military, that is solely dependent on the government for everything you have and eat. It is not hard to understand why you are afraid of change. But I assure you, it is going to be okay.


3 posted on 03/29/2016 10:30:49 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - If he's willing to lie about it, he's willing to be blackmailed over it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
both GOP candidates are gaming the calculator: They've proposed tremendous cuts, but without knowing who will pay for those cuts

The concept of "paying for tax cuts" is profoundly illogical. Allowing taxpayers to keep more of their money requires no expenditure. What libs really mean to ask is this: how will the lost revenue be recovered? Essentially, they're frightened to death of the gov't cutting entitlement programs for the welfare leech class. Aka, the Democrat base.

4 posted on 03/29/2016 10:32:00 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The article is somewhat lacking in the understanding of economics and Trump’s proposals. Healthcare for instance-——http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=231191


7 posted on 03/29/2016 10:34:59 PM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Cruz and Trump are offering tax cuts of extraordinary size — and they haven’t said a word about how they’ll pay for them.”

What a bizzarro statement very telling of the world we live in. It would seem more appropriate if the author would have said something like “Bernie is going to raise taxes on citizens by $14,130 without saying a word about how those people can afford to have that much money comfiscated from them”.


11 posted on 03/29/2016 10:41:22 PM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What’s additionally funny about Sander’s healthcare proposal is that the people of Vermont passed in 2012 a single-payer plan for the state that Sanders readily endorsed. Vermont scrapped the plan late last year as the cost was deemed excessively outrageous. In order for it to work they need monies from taxpayers of other states........sharing the pain.


14 posted on 03/29/2016 10:46:06 PM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Patriots, noting that low-information Senator Sanders and likewise low-information former Senator Hillary Clinton are excellent examples why the states should have never ratified the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, please consider the following.

From a related thread …

$765,645,000,000: FY2016 Taxes Set Record Through December; $5,107 Per Worker; Feds Still Run…

Four times the amount shown in thread title indicates an over $3 trillion annual federal budget. And we will probably never hear misguided Hillary Clinton mention the following major constitutional problem with an annual federal government budget that big.

Note that a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress is prohibited from appropriating taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. This is evidenced by the excerpt below.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

In fact, based on the Court’s statement above, here is a rough estimate of how much taxpayers should be paying Congress annually to perform its Section 8-limited power duties.

Given that the plurality of clauses in Section 8 deal with defense, and given that the Department of Defense budget for 2015 was $500+ billion, I will generously round up the $500+ billion figure to $1 trillion (but probably much less) as the annual price tag of the federal government to the taxpayers.

In other words, the corrupt media, including Obama guard dog Fx Noise, should not be reporting multi-trillion dollar annual federal budgets without mentioning the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to appropriate taxes in budget discussions.

Remember in November!

When patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect, they need to also elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its Section 8-limited powers to support the new president, including putting a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes.

Also consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

16 posted on 03/29/2016 10:55:17 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Tax cuts do not have to be ‘paid for’ taxes are not the property of the government. Taxes are organized legal theft.


18 posted on 03/29/2016 11:02:30 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Lord, I hope a lot of people go to this Vox calculator during the generals. Ezra might have to take it down!


19 posted on 03/29/2016 11:14:01 PM PDT by struggle (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Clinton just wants the power and has made a deal with the elites to get it.


20 posted on 03/29/2016 11:52:20 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And that is why I am up at 1:30 am placing millions of dollars of real estate up for sale.

How scary are the times now?

Not waiting for a Trump or Cruz victory, since they are pounding the snot out of each other.

Gonna be Hill or Crazy ol Bernie.


23 posted on 03/30/2016 12:22:48 AM PDT by GeaugaRepublican ("Donald Trump is the last hope for America" Phyllis Schlafly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How to pay for tax cuts?

What an idiot.

Cut the gov’t largesse, you dumb shiite .


24 posted on 03/30/2016 3:26:46 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Has it gotten through to them no one sane believes the “who’s going to pay for this tax cut” garbage anymore?


25 posted on 03/30/2016 3:45:13 AM PDT by Read Write Repeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ezra Kline was the originator of JournOlist back in 2007/08, which was made up of about 300 “reporters” and bloggers who were actively campaigning for 0bama. It was his bunch that savaged Palin throughout the election, and even after she returned to Alaska.

He is scum.


29 posted on 03/30/2016 5:06:19 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson