Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Cost Of “Free Trade” Is Too Great For Americans to Bear
economyincrisis ^ | 3/23/16 | Patrick Kellen

Posted on 03/30/2016 6:26:02 AM PDT by central_va

“Free trade” would more accurately be called “freedom for other countries to undercut and destroy American domestic production” because in practice that is what is happening. This is an undeniable fact that should be obvious to any consumer or business in this country. Very little of what is consumed here is made by American-owned companies operating in America. This was not formerly the case, and it was not how the wealth of this country was created.

Proponents of “free trade” justify their position by saying it is supplying American consumers with access to the lowest cost, most competitive market. However, this does not justify the terrible consequences. Proponents dismiss the destruction to American domestic production by wishfully thinking we will find new ways to reinvent ourselves. How will we continue to pay for these cheap foreign goods with no industry to generate our own wealth?

“Free trade” proponents fail to say that free access to subsidized foreign production is destroying America’s chances to be competitive.

(Excerpt) Read more at economyincrisis.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: free; sucks; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 next last
To: Eric Pode of Croydon

You could just round them up into gas chambers. Then the handful of people who control production could keep their “freedom”.


121 posted on 03/30/2016 2:40:21 PM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

Don’t give these Free Traitors™ any ideas


122 posted on 03/30/2016 2:43:52 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

Sounds as if you are in a lather about the problem, but not enough to, you know, give it some serious thought.


123 posted on 03/30/2016 2:44:19 PM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
Trade and buying from China has helped lift millions out of poverty, increasing their purchasing power, while reducing our costs.

I am an American I don't care what, why or how third worlders live. In that context I only care about my fellow Americans. Americans are under no obligation to lift anyone out of anything. Especially at the expense of the American economy and middle class.

124 posted on 03/30/2016 2:49:03 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Less tariffs, less income taxes. Starve the beast.

Less tariffs? That is not possible. We are in tariff panacea now, tariffs are at all time low on imports. Basically we have no import duties. The doors are wide open now. Doesn't seem to be helping the average citizen much.

125 posted on 03/30/2016 2:52:46 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon

My serious thought is forcing China to adopt reasonable standards of regulations, safety, pay.

We shouldn’t trade with any countries that don’t meet certain minimal standards. That thought is quite serious.

You are basically calling me stupid. “lather about the problem” “serious thought”. I’m calling you naive and delusional about your economic dogma.

Where do you draw the line, if any? Do you favor trade with a country that employs forced labor or slavery? How about forced organ donation?

Do you favor free trade with the Islamic State?

Come one, give me your “serious thought”, if you have one that lies outside dogma.


126 posted on 03/30/2016 3:00:49 PM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet
So you want to deal with the problem not by removing the heavy hand of government in America, but by adding a heavy hand to other countries.

OK, got it. You've done some thinking. It may be statist thinking, but I will concede it's thinking.

127 posted on 03/30/2016 3:04:53 PM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet
reasonable standards of regulations, safety, pay

Please show me the section of the Constitution which includes these as functions of the federal government.

128 posted on 03/30/2016 3:10:15 PM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

It has been.

Where do you think American companies are constantly expanding?

Look how many Iphone sales are in China for example


129 posted on 03/30/2016 3:11:01 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Sure you do. Who the hell will buy our products if they are poor and broke?

You don’t see us being able to sell capitol goods, or export education to North Koreans


130 posted on 03/30/2016 3:12:05 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Sure you do. Who the hell will buy our products if they are poor and broke?

You don’t see us being able to sell capitol goods, or export education to North Koreans


131 posted on 03/30/2016 3:12:06 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

You know who is going to put the bullet to American workers?

Uber

Thumbtack

Homeadvisor

Self driving cars

The gig economy.

What once took thousands to do, will only take 1 worker to do. It is why Silicon Valley titans are floating the concept of a “guaranteed basic income”

The creativity and success of our tech industry is going to kill low skill jobs. Just like why we don’t have horse drawn carriage manufacturers anymore


132 posted on 03/30/2016 3:14:58 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
Sure you do. Who the hell will buy our products if they are poor and broke?

The trade imbalance with China is 3:1 against us. They are not buying our stuff. You can't make this situation worse buy fighting back. We are on the floor.

133 posted on 03/30/2016 3:15:08 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: central_va

They can’t afford to buy all our stuff.

Our average per capita income is 5x the average Chinese. We also import significant consumer goods, while exporting capital goods. And again, we make much more money.

Its not a wonder why we have a 3 to 1 import/export ratio.

We need the Chinese to be making more money to afford our stuff.


134 posted on 03/30/2016 3:17:15 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: central_va

They can’t afford to buy all our stuff.

Our average per capita income is 5x the average Chinese. We also import significant consumer goods, while exporting capital goods. And again, we make much more money.

Its not a wonder why we have a 3 to 1 import/export ratio.

We need the Chinese to be making more money to afford our stuff.


135 posted on 03/30/2016 3:17:15 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon
Please show me the section of the Constitution which includes these as functions of the federal government.

They are not. That is not an argument I would use for ending Free Trade. There are tons of reason why our economy is dying due to Free Trade and that is not one of them IMO.

136 posted on 03/30/2016 3:17:19 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
Its not a wonder why we have a 3 to 1 import/export ratio.

We used to run a surplus with China. I do not seem to remember shortages of a consumer goods then and we made out own stuff. We survived without them and without us they'd be speaking Japanese.

137 posted on 03/30/2016 3:19:24 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Yes the world changes. Trying to run an export surplus is not a worthwhile goal as you need to 1) devalue your currency and 2) make a bunch of cheap crap.

I have no problem letting China be the factory of the world and produce low priced consumer goods.

I prefer America to produce high end capital goods, software, medicine, education, all of which leads to our standard of living rising.

And it has since 1981 when Reagan came into office and promoted trade so heavily.

“Where others fear trade and economic growth, we see opportunities for creating new wealth and undreamed-of opportunities for millions in our own land and beyond. Where others seek to throw up barriers, we seek to bring them down; where others take counsel of their fears, we follow our hopes.”

Ronald Reagan

Read more at: http://www.azquotes.com/quote/678278


138 posted on 03/30/2016 3:23:34 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: central_va

We have other industries. Industries have always throughout time gone away for one reason or another and new ones have been created to replace them. There is typically some pain in the transition period. The government cannot legislate a pain-free economy for us.


139 posted on 03/30/2016 3:24:31 PM PDT by JediJones (I'm with Ted Cruz, Mark Levin, Dana Loesch, Steve Deace, Michelle Malkin, James Woods & Ben Shapiro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I agree that some of the trade agreements we've entered into in recent decades are heavily larded with cronyism, and I'd scrap them as fast as you would.

But trying to solve cronyism and over-regulation with tariffs is like trying to cure cancer by contracting syphilis.

140 posted on 03/30/2016 3:26:06 PM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson