Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fallout: Donald Trump Will Fall 50-100 Delegates Short of 1,237 Needed to Clinch Nomination
Breitbart.com ^ | 6 Apr 2016 | Mike Flynn & Michael Patrick Leahy

Posted on 04/07/2016 6:10:31 AM PDT by Rockitz

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)’s overwhelming victory in Wisconsin on Tuesday makes it all but impossible for GOP frontrunner Donald Trump to win the 1,237 delegates he needs to secure the nomination ahead of the RNC convention in Cleveland.

Trump currently leads the GOP field with 743 delegates. He would need to win 58.9 percent of the remaining pledged delegates to obtain the simple majority necessary.

A number of the states remaining award delegates proportionally. The bulk of delegates in one critical upcoming state, Pennsylvania, aren’t officially bound to any candidate. The fight for California’s massive 172 delegates will be fought largely in each of the state’s 54 Congressional Districts.

As a result, Breitbart News estimates that Donald Trump will end the primary portion of the nomination fight with 1164 delegates, 74 short of the 1,237 delegates necessary to win the nomination on the first ballot. This estimate assumes Trump’s performance in upcoming contests is consistent with the results prior to Wisconsin.

In other words, it is a static estimate, assuming no great change in the trajectory, tone, or focus of the campaigns. It isn’t based on any future missteps, like those experienced by the Trump campaign ahead of the Wisconsin primary. Our assumption is, in many respects, the most optimistic for the Trump campaign. Because of this, it underscores the steep challenge Donald Trump faces heading into the 4th Quarter of the primary season.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bs; cruz2016; dontcountonit; michaelpatrickleahy; mikeflynn; ntsa; trump; trump2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-303 next last
To: Aria

“Some of the solutions are fairly simple i.e build the wall.”

True enough, but since Trump has already indicated he is willing to negotiate on that I am less optimistic than you that he will follow through.


“Perhaps the most complex part of the job would be dealing with Congress and I believe this is why Trump said he’d choose a VP with deep experience (Jeff Sessions?).”

Of all the terms I would use to describe Sessions, “Congressional dealmaker” would not be one of them. His popularity among his colleagues is only infinitesimally greater than Cruz. Which is why I like Sessions so much. I would put the greatest likelihood for VP as Kasich and have said so for at least six months.


“Providing for the common defense is something I believe Trump would be excellent at - as well as protecting our rights.”

We will have to honorably agree to disagree. I think that Trump’s thin-skinned irritability will likely weaken our defenses, and given his desire to diminish for example the First Amendment so he can more easily punish his critics, I do not see him favorably in either context.


161 posted on 04/07/2016 7:35:15 AM PDT by crusher (GREEN: Globaloney for the Gullible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
That's up to the Malaysians. Slavery in our country was up to us.

Buying Malaysian goods produced by foreign slaves the Malaysians keeps is immoral.

Is the way to fight prostitution to arrest the prostitutes or arrest the John's?

The main reason why businessmen in the North wanted to end slavery is because that would knee-cap the South economically and it would be easier to have industry-protecting tariffs in place, with the South put in its place.

Now that they can profit from overseas slavery, I find it a big hilarious that the same kind of people today are in favor of buying slave goods from Malaysia. Venal, immoral, evil people who if there is a Hell, will burn in it.


162 posted on 04/07/2016 7:36:23 AM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

That’s how his delegate mathematician Barry Bennet has it figured.

Here’s some background on Barry B:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3418010/posts?page=27#14


163 posted on 04/07/2016 7:36:37 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Lincoln won the GOP nomination in 1860 at a contested convention. Nothing is being stolen from Trump. If he doesn’t seal the deal on the first ballot, losing the nomination on subsequent ballots isn’t theft.

You may now continue with your illogical emotional whining and threats about what Trump will do if he loses.


A good fact to point out in the history of party nominations for presidential candidates.

Today however, there is instantaneous communications available between voters and delegates. To say that the voters desires will be ignored also means that the parties can be ignored too and if anything has been proven in American Politics and History is that Change happens all too frequently.

Of course on the other side of that coin are the sayings:

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.”

“More things change, the more they stay the same.”


164 posted on 04/07/2016 7:37:03 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

Still hoping for Hillary to be in jail rather than the nominee.


165 posted on 04/07/2016 7:37:10 AM PDT by austingirl (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet
Has zippo to do with what happened in the 1860's. A sin now doesn't justify a sin from 160 years ago.
166 posted on 04/07/2016 7:37:36 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

True. It’s the new definition of ‘ground game’. ;-)


167 posted on 04/07/2016 7:38:10 AM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer; Red Steel

Ping!


168 posted on 04/07/2016 7:39:07 AM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

If true, this was the eGOP’s spoiler plan working. However, NONE of the remaining candidates will beat Hillary so we’ll have 2008 all over again where millions of voters refused to vote for McInsane so Zero won. Same with Kasich or Ryan or Cruz. Millions wont vote for them so Hillary/Bernie will win.

The eGOP would rather lose at this point than allow Trump to win. Trump isn’t a member of the eGOP and they fear that. These political parties are about themselves and not America. Screw the EGOP. I won’t vote for them State, local, or federal.


169 posted on 04/07/2016 7:39:18 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

How would the nomination get “stolen” from Trump if he does not get the necessary delegates?


170 posted on 04/07/2016 7:42:57 AM PDT by fatez (Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: austingirl

A lot of people, including Democrats hate Hillary. Bernie is just as likely to win. if Hillary gets indicted, Bernie wins.

Bernie will be harder to beat than Hillary. The old, shriveled feminist Dems that support Hillary will bite the bullet and vote for Bernie over any Republican. No so much true for Bernie voters... so would abstain from voting out of sour grapes if Hillary wins — especially the enthusiastic young voters for Bernie.


171 posted on 04/07/2016 7:43:15 AM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: redangus

Destroying the party has been his goal along.


On the contrary. It is the hysterical never Trumpers, many of whom support Cruz, that are destroying the GOP. The natural reaction to Never Trump is Never GOP.

Could be rough night down ticket for the GOP in November if Trumpers follow the Romney rule and write in their candidates.


172 posted on 04/07/2016 7:43:47 AM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Thanks for the link jjotto.

This sounds more like Trump was expecting a yes answer before he asked anyone.

Sort of like me telling my buddies on Monday I asked to use Dad’s car this Friday but I didn’t know that Dad needed to use it instead.

Not lying but jumping the gun. Looks like he found a work around. Of course, as a Trump supporter, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on this.


173 posted on 04/07/2016 7:43:56 AM PDT by Jay Thomas (If not for my faith in Christ, I would despair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
Get what? If the nom is stolen from Trump he pushes the GOP destruct button on his phone. Ted Cruz will never be POTUS.

Hey, if Donnie Orange can't get 1,237, nothing is being "stolen" from him. Of course, destroying the GOP to make way for President Hillary was his plan all along.
174 posted on 04/07/2016 7:44:01 AM PDT by Antoninus (Dump The Rump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Out of curiosity, are you in favor of the TPP?


175 posted on 04/07/2016 7:44:02 AM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
WTH is this unbound delegate crapola?. People vote for a candidate but the delegates can vote however? What kinda BS system is this? And the DemRats have superdelegates beyond the voter representation. Corrupt tasbards extreme.

You're exactly right. During this election cycle, a lot of crap has been exposed that some of us never knew before. Both parties are corrupt to the core.

176 posted on 04/07/2016 7:44:41 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

“If Trump is that close, he will win on the first ballot with uncommitteds and released delegates. “

Exactly. Trump only needs to make up the short fall and that is so easily done it’s ridiculous.


177 posted on 04/07/2016 7:45:21 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

So five votes short is not clear but one vote over is? OK..keep playing the GOPe rules and enjoy years of one party rule because the Republican party will be dead.


178 posted on 04/07/2016 7:45:30 AM PDT by Wright Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: fatez

How would the nomination get “stolen” from Trump if he does not get the necessary delegates?


Because there is no other viable national candidate. Trump will have won by far the most states, most of the important battleground states and the popular vote. No other candidate is in that universe. Period.


179 posted on 04/07/2016 7:45:36 AM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Hey, if Donnie Orange can’t get 1,237, nothing is being “stolen” from him. Of course, destroying the GOP to make way for President Hillary was his plan all along.


No, that Cruz Supporter Bishop Romney’s “never Trump” plan. You’re known by the company you keep, FRIend.


180 posted on 04/07/2016 7:46:41 AM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson