Posted on 04/07/2016 9:13:39 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Today’s followers of Trotsky should read what happened to their inspiration. Despite being a “loved” and “loyal” communist, Trotsky had an unfortunate encounter with a fellow communist (Believed to have been sent by Stalin) . . . one swinging an ice axe.
Communists - Obama, Bernie, and Hillary; no different from Lenin, Stalin, and Castro - are not loyal to their useful idiots; they only care about gathering power over others and then wielding that power. They are more than okay with “breaking a few eggs” to make the omelet they dream of; they enjoy that part of their rule the most.
Free food, free money, free medical care, free housing to name a few.
Eventually you do get peace when everyone is cowed by "strongmen" and made incapable of functioning by malnutrition.
Dude is right though. It' not safe for genocidal totalitarians like him to try to do everything he wants.
I don't think Africa is a violent hell hole because of the color of their skin. It is because of the absence of God and Christian/Judaeo values.
Even if you take a white group of people like Germany and omit God like the Nazi's did, it will become a violent hell hole as it did in WWII.... or like the white people of Russia did when they instituted atheist Communism.
Well said. I’m white but I think the “complete” blending of the races is inevitable. That doesn’t have to come at the expense of marginalization or eliminating whites or white culture or any other race or culture. Whites via the Founding Fathers found a way to bring us all together via a system of government that mandated that men’s rights be respected and protected. After the Civil War, whites realized these Constitutional rights must be universal to truly work. Now, we are apparently moving in the opposite direction where whites are the victim of our own idealistic overreach.
[satirical commentary directed at those with an appreciation of U.S. history . . . or not]
I used the term red people as you used the term redness. I apologize for jumping to conclusions as to what your post was pointing to; that there has never been peace regardless of the race of people. There have been a few times here where someone has actually posted some nasty remarks about about the native Americans and the superior white race and they meant it, and, as you say, although I am just a human being, someone gloating over wiping out my ancestors can hit a nerve.
As far as I’m concerned it’s all history and I’m living right now, where in this country there is opportunity for all. I wish people like the professor in the article and all the other race whores would do the same.
Again, sorry for jumping to conclusions, sometimes it’s the only exercise I get.
Africa is proof that blacks never live in peace.
You can’t have peace if anti-white racism exists.
I respect the American Indian, and there were many injustices, I guess I got a little hot myself because of the assumption that simply because I am White, I or my ancestors are responsible for anything that happened to slaves or Indians. I waste no time in educating the rude ones that I am first generation, my family is Magyar(Hungarian), historically, but American first since '52 and if they want to talk slaughter, slavery and subjugation I require them to read up on the History of Hungary first.
Bottom line is there will never be complete peace on Earth until people are no longer divided by their color, or religion.
Take care and enjoy your weekend, I think we are both actually of the same opinion on this issue.
Thank you both for dealing with your communications forthrightly. Miscommunication happens, and I deplore the current culture of anger and vitriol that infects so many threads on FR these days.
It is a wonderful thing to see when people can resolve such potentially explosive miscommunications with thought and sensitivity.
Thank you. I’m also part Jew, so you can imagine what I would go through if I just sat around being angry about long past history, LOL. I am 100 percent American and detest the way the leftists are trying to divide us into different groups and classes.
You enjoy your weekend too and thank you for responding.
I agree. Sometimes with written communication especially a person’s intent can be misunderstood.
If only we could bring some civility to the political threads!
There is the rule of law, and you enforce it.
If rebellion breaks out, there is the rule of law to resolve the issue.
I don’t back government ‘abuse’, unless government intervention is clearly called for. If a lawless society wishes to push their agenda to the point they become so anti-societal that only a show of force will resolve the issue, then so be it.
Once they realize that open rebellion is not an option, they will decide to live peacefully as part of the system or be incarcerated or die.
It’s not a very pretty thing to contemplate, but what else is there?
Do we surrender civilized society to them, or do we force compliance so we all can live in peace?
“There is the rule of law, and you enforce it.”
That’s right - and the politicians change laws all the time and have enacted new laws to pander to the low IQ group and severely punish the higher IQ group - anti-descrimination laws, affirmative action laws, set-asides, diversity laws, welfare laws, etc. Just as I described as inevitable.
” It’s not a very pretty thing to contemplate, but what else is there?”
A friendly separation of the races. Even Lincoln advocated that. Unfortunately he didn’t follow through when it would have been much easier. And in South Africa whites are establishing white only towns.
And even here in the US there is a movement afoot that’s promoting similar ideas.
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/
Separatist movements are not something I support.
That’s fine.
Your remaining choices are:
1. The status quo of ratcheting up of laws against your group to where being “white” becomes a crime, and real criminals become a protected class.
2. Not pandering to the low IQ group as you suggested and being in a state of constant revolt and/or a police state. This would mean undoing all the anti-descrimination and preferential treatment laws - which would be near impossible and would cause huge riots, and the best case outcome would be a police state.
3.??
I’m not going to support a separatist movement. If you wish to think that’s terrible, then think that’s terrible.
All citizens will be required to live by civilized laws.
Those who wish to live in a sane decent society will do so. The others will be addressed.
That’s how it works.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.