Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/13/2016 1:08:39 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

I know from personal experience far too much information is classified. Simply getting rid of “confidential” wont do much as it would simply become Sensitive but unclassified.

Pretty much the same security requirements.

From what I’ve read most of Hillarys email server data was Top Secret and above.


2 posted on 04/13/2016 1:11:01 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ever since my days spent dealing with classified material, I’ve believed government wildly over-classifies everything.
While I could see the possible need for it in the military, fedguv domestically operates in a permanent CYA, opaque manner. Of course, to do otherwise sharply decreases the opportunity for graft.


3 posted on 04/13/2016 1:13:02 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Let’s not classify anything — let our enemies know everything we are doing in all details. Brilliant move! (/sarc)


5 posted on 04/13/2016 1:17:48 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Obama Administration is trying to diffuse the damage done by Hillary Clinton's email leaks.

If most of her emails were “confidential” , the Obama Administration can say that they are trying to abolish “confidential “ classification so what's the big deal.

8 posted on 04/13/2016 1:22:02 PM PDT by rdcbn ("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Millera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I won’t be able to properly evaluate the recommendations made in this article until I know what level of classification applies to Obama’s original birth registration document.


9 posted on 04/13/2016 1:23:08 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There is Confidential, Secret and Top Secret.
That’s it.
“Above Top Secret” is an invention.
It is TS with caveates, but it is still Top Secret.
Confidential is a classification level that is not Secret.
Reporters and obummer, and others should know better—they are trying to mitigate Hitlery’s guilt.


10 posted on 04/13/2016 1:23:42 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So, the unintended consequence will be marking everything “secret” that used to be “confidential”.


11 posted on 04/13/2016 1:29:32 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Not a good idea. When we received information from foreign governments with a classification that we do not have then we must treat it with our next higher classification. For instance, when I was in the Army we had some British magazines that were marked "Restricted." This was basically "not for public distribution." For the Brits this would include professional literature that was distributed to the troops but was not available to the public. This stuff could be out in the open in the barracks without any concerns. But since the U.S. does not have a "Restricted" classification we had to treat it as if it were "Confidential" and keep it locked in the safe. If we got rid of "Confidential" then we would have to treat all foreign source "Confidential" material as if it were marked "Secret."
14 posted on 04/13/2016 1:40:20 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Shell game designed to make it look like Clinton’s systematic breach of natural security was merely to cut through bureaucratic red tape.

Other people went to prison for much less.

Obama and Clinton are for two Americas. One for the elite. One for the rest of us.


15 posted on 04/13/2016 1:41:23 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I think you would have to declassify everything to fix Hillary’s problem.


17 posted on 04/13/2016 1:48:05 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let the FOIA games begin!

-PJ

19 posted on 04/13/2016 1:49:42 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Was clapper on his knees wiping something dripping from his lips when he made this statement...
Clapper is a useless slug an incompetent political hack...
The DNI is a condom stopping the flow of useful Intel and an obozo foil....

Pathetic .....


26 posted on 04/13/2016 4:57:11 PM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Obama Administration Weighs Nixing 'Confidential' Classification"

Is this a preemptive blanket pardon for his administration?
28 posted on 04/13/2016 5:49:41 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson