Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Judge Rules Sandy Hook Victims Can Sue "Military-Style" Gun-Maker
zero hedge ^ | 4/14/15 | tyler durden

Posted on 04/14/2016 3:48:03 PM PDT by Nachum

In a somewhat stunning decision, SkyNews reports that a US judge has ruled that the families of victims in the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School can sue the maker of the weapon used in the attack, arguing the Bushmaster rifle is a military weapon that should not have been sold to civilians.

As SkyNews reports,

Gun companies had sought to reject the negligence and wrongful death lawsuit filed two years after the attack by nine victims' relatives and a survivor.

 

But Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis said a 2005 federal law protecting gun-makers from lawsuits does not shield the companies from legal action in this case.

 

She ruled that lawyers for the victims' families can still argue the semi-automatic rifle is a military weapon and should not have been sold to civilians.

 

The legal action names Remington Arms, maker of the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, model XM15-E2S, as well as the distributor and seller.

 

A lawyer for the families, Josh Koskoff, welcomed Thursday's news that the lawsuit can proceed.

 

"We are thrilled that the gun companies' motion to dismiss was denied," he said.

 

"The families look forward to continuing their fight in court."


(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; connecticut; evilblackgun; guns; judge; sandyhook; secondhandgunsmoke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Nachum
Now the Sandy Hook “Shooting” can be exposed as the hoax it really is.
21 posted on 04/14/2016 4:37:21 PM PDT by amigatec (2 Thess 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Comin' fer yer guns

You ain't lyin.
22 posted on 04/14/2016 4:43:41 PM PDT by softengine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

While in the Air Force, I was trained and proficient in carrying a Smith & Wesson Model 15 Combat Masterpiece 6-shot revolver—designed just like any other revolver on the commercial market.

Given this judge’s predilection for the absurd, I guess that is a “military style” firearm, right??


23 posted on 04/14/2016 4:44:56 PM PDT by Skybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
It’ll be appealed and overruled immediately. Federal law makes this lawsuit illegal. Gun manufacturers who follow all laws and sell legally cannot be sued for criminal misuse.

Not immediately. And it will cost Remington a lot of money for legal fees.

But Remington (and everyone else) will also sell a lot more ARs while this is taking its time going through the courts.

24 posted on 04/14/2016 4:45:40 PM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Every nation has the government it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Forty five years ago, anti-handgun Hollywood discovered the Miller decision and decided handguns were NOT standard issue military equipment so were not protected by the Second Amendment.

Rifles were standard issue and blessed by the TV producers, until around 1984 when they discovered a ban on semi-auto rifles might fly!


25 posted on 04/14/2016 4:51:11 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skybird

The 15 is likely the best .38 fighting revolver ever made. Although I prefer running .38’s in my pre-19.


26 posted on 04/14/2016 4:52:45 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The lawyer that brought the suit should be imprisoned for fraud, and the plaintiffs should be in jail for life for contempt.


27 posted on 04/14/2016 4:53:33 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The price of a Bushmaster just went through the roof.

Bushmaster is not even made by Bushmaster anymore.

If you want one made on the original tooling buy one from Windham arms


28 posted on 04/14/2016 5:01:07 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

We all do.


29 posted on 04/14/2016 5:03:18 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

If Hillary is elected, you can bet they will.


30 posted on 04/14/2016 5:03:41 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Okay! So now we can sue car makers for the death their vehicles cause. The vehicle should not have been sold to that crazy alcoholic. Stabbing victims, etc.


31 posted on 04/14/2016 5:04:43 PM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men (people) to come to the aid of their country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

These so called “judges” are out of control. Time to start throwing their asses in jail. Their “lawyer” pals love this. Automobiles should never have been sold to alcoholics coming next. Knives, hammers and baseball bats must be locked up in a safe when in the home. Jail all of these greedy, sleazy bastards.


32 posted on 04/14/2016 5:05:34 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The DNC's Boston Globe really sucks. All the BS about global warming and now more about Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All

The Judge should be impeached.

This is a classic case of an emotion and politically driven decision.


33 posted on 04/14/2016 5:10:28 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

We have from now till then to prepare. If we let them do it. it is our fault.


34 posted on 04/14/2016 5:10:50 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All

“a military weapon that should not have been sold to civilians”

Gee, and leftists have assured us, for decades, that only military weapons are protected by the Second Amendment, because “militia!”


35 posted on 04/14/2016 5:14:01 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“If you want one made on the original tooling buy one from Windham arms.”

And some of the Windham folks left and started Del-Ton. Excepting some of the high-end AR’s, they are generic as a box of Kleenex!


36 posted on 04/14/2016 5:17:49 PM PDT by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

“Not immediately. And it will cost Remington a lot of money for legal fees.”

Under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), there is a provision for recovery of legal fees.

Remington is likely to be awarded seven figures. I wonder if the lawyer for these fools told them that they are liable for that.

I suspect that he did not.


37 posted on 04/14/2016 5:19:09 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

When I was a kid in the 60’s any 12 year old with 60 bucks could order an M1 Garand and some ammo and the postman would bring it to your door

The M1 is a TRUE battlefield rifle.

Somehow mayhem and carnage did not ensue


38 posted on 04/14/2016 5:41:51 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

I was unaware of that.


39 posted on 04/14/2016 5:42:59 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
The judge is no nitwit. I knew her when she was a very fine trial attorney an my opponent in a normal civil action in which she represented an insurance company in a personal injury case. I also knew her and appeared before her in her early years as a judge. She is a very fine lady of impeccable reputation, very strong intellect, very firm principles personally but an open-minded judge. She is a practicing serious member of the Greek Orthodox Church and quite conservative as to social issues and religious values.

All Connecticut trial court judges are appointed by the governor from a list of potential judges containing only the names of those who have the support of both State Central Committee members of the Democrat and Republican parties in an arrangement that has worked well since the modern Connecticut court system was created in 1958. Haf the nominees (and judges) are Democrat and half are Republican by tradition. I don't know whether Barbara Bellis is a Democrat or a Republican.

Terms are for eight years and are not limited and the judge is seated only after the Connecticut Senate approves the nomination after a public hearing. This avoids judges running for election and making promises they ought not to make and raising campaign $$$$$ from corrupt interests and other abuses that come with elected judges. The judges appoint the prosecutors.

That a judge may make an occasional error (even an awful one like this) is not surprising but that alone does not make a judge a "nitwit." Barbara Bellis is a very fine lady, a very fine judge generally but no more infallible than any other person serving in Connecticut state government. Being wrong does not necessarily mean being either evil or incompetent.

Finally, this is probably a very preliminary ruling. Motions as to evidence in Connecticut are heard at a once a week "short calendar" (which is anything but short and more like a cattle call) at which the overworked judge of the week has to decide some of the most foolish matters you can imagine. The judges are paid quite well (six figures fifteen years ago) and other than trials and short calendar have a light load. Some political hacks unable to earn a decent living in the private sector are taken care of by political friends. Barbara Bellis is not one of them. She took a pay cut to serve.

Some other judge will likely hear the trial, if any, and, having heard the evidence, lay waste to the gun grabbers' case. Happens all the time. The real dangers in the Connecticut Judicial system are the Appellate Court and the State Supreme Court, both of which have been backed with leftist Demonrat hacks. That is why God and the Founding Fathers gave us SCOTUS which is now also a danger.

40 posted on 04/14/2016 5:47:50 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson