“PS, if you need to rely on ad hominem attacks and avoid the law.....”
You seriously need to re-read my posts to you. Please show me, moi, one (1) ad hominem attack that I made on you.
You accuse me of being a drunk, yet project the use of ad hominem attacks on me.....let me remind you of your own words....”Citizenship Crybabies,”...Every non-lawyer, bartender, taxi driver and hairdresser...” oh, and something about being a Gypsy.....then again, being a drunk...sigh.
Avoid the Law.....projection again.... US Code 1401 is about all the various ways a person could/shall be a citizen. NBC is NOT about citizenship, it’s about a QUALITY of CITIZENSHIP. A eligibility requirement quality that tries to insure a person is 100% American in all aspects, before becoming President. An American pedigree if you will. A person born and raised by citizen parents among his countrymen and taught the history, values, mores, political philosophy, culture, society, and yes, even an appreciation for US Law!
Let’s see.... if you have a brand new dog, Poodle mother and Labrador father. It’s a dog right? Of course it is. 100% Canine. Yep! No argument! Retriever on both sides! Yesiree! Raised at home, Check!.... Now try to enter your Dog/canine into the Westminster Dog Show....won’t happen.. NO pedigree!..... Kinda like the NBC issue. NBC IS, of all the ways you can be a born citizen, the only one with the purely American Pedigree!
You’re trying to hang your hat on there being seemingly ineligible people running for President, none of which were EVER elected. Therefore, your conclusion, NBC doesn’t matter! A pure Non-Sequitor (sic). Sorry, but the NBC clause only applies if the person is ELECTED. then NBC becomes an issue. Still, recognizing that there is an issue beforehand is prudent. Refusing to see the issue and/or not taking action against it is shortsighted and foolish.
In the entire History of the US only 2 Presidents, born after the Constitution became Law, have avoided the NBC issue. President Arthur and President Obama. Arthur because he hid documentation, and had no serious challenges, only question that were avoided; and Obama through plain old fashioned brazen attitude, Democrat Party indifference and the prospect of a sure White House win, coupled with opposition party (Republican) weak knees in the face of possible backlash against an adverse decision to a “historic first” black President. In Obama. the Founders fears about what such a Presidency could result in, came true..
That the Court didn’t hear challenges to Obama isn’t, as Justice Clarence Tomas put it, because of no merit, but rather a simple example of “Judicial Cowardice.” see above....”weak kneed Republicans.”
Like LT Chard, Royal Engineers, and his Welshmen at Rorke’s Drift, we’re surrounded! (Or Chesty at Choisen.)
Seriously, as a self described legal beagle, “teaching ConLaw 101,” you KNOW that failure to uphold/enforce the law can, and often does, result in precedent, nullification of the law, or the ability to exercise one’s rights at a future date.
Question??? Did Obama/ Arthur/ Cruz, etc. commit FRAUD when they certified to the various Sec. of States that they met ALL Article II eligibility requirements? (Answer Obama didn’t, he only certified that he was the Democrat nominee.)
Rationality is often difficult for ideologues to cope with/ understand. Logic is even harder! Expediency is no legitimate reason not to try....
What were those lyrics? “I can make you feel, but I can’t make you think.......” Jethro Tull
You mental masturbation and personal attacks are not worth a reply.
You never even got point #1. I wanted Trump to win on the issues that can carry him to victory in November, not this citizenship idiocy that only gets him laughed at in intelligent circles, and some support of those who should be laughed at themselves.
Good by.