Posted on 04/19/2016 10:29:31 AM PDT by Biggirl
Citing GOP frontrunner Donald Trump’s long history of supporting “ultra-liberal” Democrats, Rafael Cruz, father of Sen, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) , told Breitbart News Daily host Stephen K. Bannon that as president Donald Trump “would be worse than Hillary Clinton, but he cannot beat Hillary Clinton.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
And ROTTEN to the core.
“Why would ANYONE in their right mind, choose to support Cruz when Cruz is endorsed and supported by the likes of Jeb Bush and the rest of the treasonous Bush crime syndicate, by Mitt Romney, by Lindsey Graham, Carly Fiorina, ad nauseum infinitum?”
Simple. We have always had Establishment FReepers. I do believe Rove/Cruz/Bush et al are FLOODING FR with Cruz people.
I expect them to jump cleanly and with purpose into the free air of the abyss with their eye still closed and their hands over their ears.
There will be a lot of crossover voters if Trump is the candidate just like Reagan had in the 80s. The Dem voters are voting for a government check. One more term for the left wingers and this country will be bankrupt. Smart Dem voters will understand this and vote for the conservative. Should be more than enough for a Republican win.
So, you swallowed the cool aid and are willing to put a second illegal alien in the oval office.
Cruz is the reincarnation of Jeb Bush.
Too bad.
Time to hop on the Trump train. Next destination White House.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFlE5KNdOqk
nump
There will be a lot of crossover voters if Trump is the candidate just like Reagan had in the 80s. The Dem voters are voting for a government check. One more term for the left wingers and this country will be bankrupt. Smart Dem voters will understand this and vote for the conservative. Should be more than enough for a Republican win
Reagan didn’t replace his base with Democrats. Besides, no evidence what you said will happen. In head to head match ups, he loses to Hillary. And even worse, his negatives are record level
Reagan was well behind Carter right after the primaries and he won overwhelmingly. If the Republicans do not support Trump if he wins the nomination then they deserve the socialism, that will surely come. I suspect when it comes to a Clinton Presidency or a Trump Presidency they will go with Trump.
Reagan was well behind Carter right after the primaries and he won overwhelmingly
Not a good comparison.
Reagan was running against an very unpopular incumbent, Reagan shored up the conservative base, the demograhics were different, and Reagan did not have near 70% negative rating by the voters.
I cannot predict what will happen in Nov. But I can predict we will be saying Madam President if Trump doesn’t change how he has conducted himself during the primary campaign. My prediction is he won’t. But we’ll see
Clinton is very low on favorably, most see her as a liar. Trump has summed that up well by referring to her as crooked Hilary. She is not popular among millennials that is why Sanders is giving her strong competition for the nomination. So with the Dem candidate with no accomplishments and poor favorability the race is going to be very competitive. No democratic Presidential candidate has been elected 3 times in a row I believe since Roosevelt so history is not on their side. The economy is the main issue and Trump is uniquely positioned to turn it around. Clinton knows nothing about business and is hostile to free enterprise and cannot solve economic problems. Trump has an excellent opportunity to win the Presidency.
Says the Southern Evangelical who could not win Southern Evangelicals in a GOP election and who could not get to 50% support in his home state of Texas.
Is this for real???
Holy smokes! I just don’t know, though. But wow!
Cruz has yet to tell Americans:
<><> what role does he plan for his preacher father in the US govt?
<><> what govt job does he plan to give his G/S globalist lawyer wife?
<><> how will Goldman Sachs factor into the US govt if Ted was at the helm?
==========================================
Recall that St Ted said we were inferior low-info voters who couldn't possible understand the global challenges ahead. BTW, Ted and Heidi Cruz/s economic libertarianism dovetails nicely w/ globalist Goldman/Sachs---who financed Ted into office. G/S is Heidi's $700,000 a year employer.
Heidi Cruz’ NAU comment is under Additional and Dissenting Opinions on pages 33 and 34 of the paper. Taken directly from the paper.
[quoting Heidi Cruz ...] I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us—truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants. — Heidi S. Cruz
LOL......love it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.