Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Great American Economic Growth Myth——-Real GDP Gains Since 1999 Even Lower Than 1930s
Contra Corner ^ | 18 April 2016 | Lance Roberts

Posted on 04/20/2016 1:57:02 PM PDT by Lorianne

While economists, politicians, and analysts point to current data points and primarily coincident indicators to create a “bullish spin” for the investing public, the underlying deterioration in economic prosperity is a much more important long-term concern. The question that we should be asking is “why is this happening?”

From 1950-1980 nominal GDP grew at an annualized rate of 7.55%. This was accomplished with a total credit market debt to GDP ratio of less 150%. The CRITICAL factor to note is that economic growth was trending higher during this span going from roughly 5% to a peak of nearly 15%. There were a couple of reasons for this. First, lower levels of debt allowed for personal savings to remain robust which fueled productive investment in the economy. Secondly, the economy was focused primarily on production and manufacturing which has a high multiplier effect on the economy. This feat of growth also occurred in the face of steadily rising interest rates which peaked with economic expansion in 1980.

(Excerpt) Read more at davidstockmanscontracorner.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: economy; gdp
long article, lots of charts, worth looking at
1 posted on 04/20/2016 1:57:02 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Bet FDR wishes he had Facebook and Twitter.


2 posted on 04/20/2016 1:58:36 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Stockman points out very accurately that the problem is the deterioration of manufacturing. The premise of a “consumer based economy” was a self-evident lie from the beginning. Nothing can be consumed that has not first been produced.

The most necessary and immediate action is to eliminate all of the Federal regulations that are assaulting our manufacturing sector, returning the responsibility to the States. Eliminate the EPA, SEC, OSHA and all other agencies that are deliberately destroying our manufacturing base.

Until manufacturing is restored, the future will remain bleak.


3 posted on 04/20/2016 2:24:02 PM PDT by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock

bump


4 posted on 04/20/2016 2:51:31 PM PDT by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


5 posted on 04/20/2016 3:54:48 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

6 posted on 04/20/2016 4:15:44 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock
Good thing the manipulated, rigged, QE infused, Ponzi scheme also known as "The Stock Market" is soaring.


7 posted on 04/20/2016 4:18:35 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Or better yet, Federal agencies willing to dummy up numbers to make the economy look GREAT!


8 posted on 04/20/2016 4:23:37 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Take government spending out of the equation and the economy tanked a long long time ago.


9 posted on 04/20/2016 4:43:12 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
From 1950-1980 nominal GDP grew at an annualized rate of 7.55%.

"Nominal GDP" means unadjusted for inflation.

As such, it's meaningless.

I don't care how pretty the charts are; without inflation, they're sawdust.

10 posted on 04/20/2016 5:19:41 PM PDT by BfloGuy ( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
You're right. $1 in 1950 equals $3.42 in 1980 (241.9%). It's $9.88 in 2016 or 888.1% (1950 to 2016). Oddly, if you run 1980 = $1.00 out to 2016 $1 = $2.89 or just 189% inflation.

Of course, it could be a bad calculator No matter what you do the value of money is in somebody else's hands rather than your own.

But Mr. Lance Roberts (article author) seems to get the point across that we need to get back to a growing economy based on agriculture or manufacturing rather than sustaining debt to move forward.

11 posted on 04/20/2016 6:10:30 PM PDT by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Appears to be a version of Wave Theory.


12 posted on 04/20/2016 8:39:21 PM PDT by Ozark Tom (Political party: Union whose leadership sold out to a shell corporation and stuck you with the dues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson