“He’s always said the very rich will be paying more under his plan, especially hedge fund managers. Have you watched any of his interviews or listened to any of his speeches?”
Yes! I’ve been screaming about him for months!!!
How are you OK with this???
This is just a soak the rich scheme!
How is that CONSERVATIVE?!!!
It’s a “don’t pretend you are soaking the rich when you are giving it right back with the other hand” scheme.
Currently the very rich use carried interest, life insurance schemes, and even long term capital gains to pay a 15% tax rate rather than the 42% marginal rate on their ordinary income.
This is not transparent, it is not conservative. It is government doing social engineering in the tax code. How is that conservative in your eyes ?
His tax plan lowers the top rate from 42% to 25% on ordinary income. It eliminates the carried interest and life insurance schemes so those people will pay 25% rather than 15%. That is raising taxes on the rich. For people with income above $300,000 their long term capital gains will go up to 20% rather than 15%, so that is raising taxes on the rich as well.
That is hardly “soaking the rich”, however. It is eliminating the government preference for passive income. Eliminating government preferences from the tax code is conservative.
I am not a fan of Trump’s tax plan. It is still too progressive for my taste. It still allows way too many people a free ride.
But ... this article is flat out wrong. There are, in fact, tax increases for the rich in his published tax plan. His statements are not contradictory, and his plan is more conservative than the existing tax system — even if it doesn’t go as far as it should to a flat tax with no deductions or credits. Of course, Cruz’s tax plan is worse than the current system — a single rate plan on income but one that retains government preferences and then adds a huge 16% VAT on all purchases.
It is hardly his fault that the author — and you, apparently — have not bothered to read or understand his published tax plan. You complain about how “simple-minded” his plans are, but you are the one who failed to read the details of the plan. That is dishonest of you.