Sounds like sour grapes to me. There is absolutely no evidence of voter fraud.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/romney-earned-zero-votes-in-some-urban-precincts/
There is plenty of evidence of voter fraud. The only debate is over how much, and how far to go to prosecute it.
Seriously? Or is this missing a /sarc tag?
Even if I believed that not a single voter in some districts wanted to vote for Romney, I would be stunned to find out that they were all sufficiently literate to be capable of indicating this on their ballots. That the media buys into this is just more evidence of one or both of the following:
1. They are complicit in the fraud.
2. They are too stupid to understand psychology, human nature, probability, and are blind to the reality of what the illiteracy rate and IQ distributions are in many urban areas (most likely those with 0 R votes.)