Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rio

What always gets ignored or downplayed by these perves and their supporters is that Sweet Cakes did not refuse because they were gay. Sweet Cakes had in fact made them cakes before and had done other things. The was only to refuse for this specific wedding, totally within their religious expression rights. But for the perves and their supporters, the truth doesn’t matter — only the objective. This country is going to hell!


26 posted on 04/28/2016 1:37:48 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: falcon99
What always gets ignored or downplayed by these perves and their supporters is that Sweet Cakes did not refuse because they were gay...The was only to refuse for this specific wedding, totally within their religious expression rights.

Kind of hard to separate the two. It's like saying, "But your honor, I didn't refuse him service because he was Jewish. I refused him service because he was wearing a Yarmulke." Hell hath no fury like a lesbian scorned and they used the state and the law to extract their revenge far out of proportion to the damages. That's probably their best argument on appeal; the punishment far out-weighed the infraction.

41 posted on 04/28/2016 3:23:10 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson