[Gaffer]

I think that kind of bathroom should be like some of the far eastern ones I’ve seen. Two footprints and a hole in the floor.

[Nifster]

Rule number one in any debate....define the terms

[Tax-chick]

Bttt.

[exDemMom]

I like that tactic. I wish I could think faster on my feet, but, unless I am talking about a topic I know really really well (like the subject of my PhD), the only way I can employ such a tactic is through the written medium.

[dware]

Read David Horowitz’s “Art of Political War and Other Radical Pursuits”. An eye opener.

[randita]

Game over, ladies and gentlemen. There simply is no way for the anti-HB2 crusaders to recover from that one.

Not quite. Liberalism is inconsistent and that is one of its strengths. Liberals are free to a apply their own twisted sense of logic any which way they choose, even if it's crazy inconsistent. If you oppose them, you are always the one who is a bigot, racist, etc. It is your mere opposition that makes you so and has nothing to do with logic or consistency.

[NonValueAdded]

The Colombo tactic, I like that!

“Oh, just one more thing ...”

:)

[Night Hides Not]

I'm in a feisty mood this morning. Fridays are casual days, which means t-shirt and jeans. I'm wearing one of my favorite shirts today, emblazoned with "Atlas Shrugged, now nonfiction."

I expect less than 5 of my 30 coworkers to even have a clue as to the message. I've never been in an office where my coworkers were not inquisitive, or particularly well read. I guess I'm the crazy old coot here. lol

[chesley]

These are good tactics, assuming that your opponents are actually motivated by what they profess to be.

I do not think leftists are. They will just change to another subject.

However, he who gets to ask the questions has the power. Just ask any criminal suspect in the hands of the police.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Well worth a read by all here —

A rare ping to the mother-of-all-ping-lists list.

And don’t forget to read Psalm 2 now and then.

[circlecity]

I have long been a fan of Greg Koukl - his book “Tactics” is excellent.

[the OlLine Rebel]

I like it.

Thanks to the author for the summary of approach.

[VRWCmember]

Excellent column by Dr. Adams.
However I am shocked that we are already past 20 posts and nobody has ridiculed the source with the “Clownhall.com” graphic.

[Kaslin]

Mike Adams Column

Please Freepmail me if you want to be added, or removed from the ping list

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Good.

[The Toll]

Time for debate with these people is long since past. The time for lead is swiftly approaching.

[Jim Noble]

When you answer rhetoric with dialectics, you ALWAYS lose.

Rhetoric is not an engagement with an equal in a mutual search for truth (that’s called dialectics).

Rhetoric is a punch in the face. Punch back harder.

It’s important. These guys are in a pre-war mode. The more we wuss out (”Democrats are the real racists”) the more aggressive they become. They are a minority, but once they start shooting, they can cause a lot of damage.

In short, you can’t “answer their arguments” because they’re not arguing. They’re attacking. If you don’t see the difference, you’re doomed to defeat.

[Lurker]

Excellent.

L

[Heart of Georgia]

The sign on the wall needs to be fixed by changing the descriptive word from “inclusive” to “REPULSIVE”

[bert]

I would suggest passive activity is a losing tactic..

We must attack and the mode of attack is massive FREep. We must get off our lazy butts and resume bringing the message in the streets