To: drewh
Sports Illustrated is throwing all of the laws out of the window and reportedly splashing a nearly nude 66-year-old woman across its cover to sell some magazines. A man dressed in women's clothing is not a woman.
2 posted on
05/05/2016 6:44:03 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Neither is it as much of “An Act of Desperation . . .” to get attention as is chopping off your dick and balls and adding fake woman parts in place thereof.
46 posted on
05/06/2016 5:07:52 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
A man dressed in women's clothing is not a woman. But this is a man NOT dressed in women's clothing.
53 posted on
05/06/2016 8:36:07 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(bombastic selfdeclared billionaire with penchant for crony capitalism and state subsidies)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson